Laserfiche WebLink
216 <br /> .July 23,1975 <br /> razin ...Pose of the d s ee iv Mr.Mrd <br /> sufficientof ttime hat stoudispose of Theethe Propert. Drain to theowner, <br /> this wo cialhardship thatimmediate abatement etthe <br /> structure would <br /> On July3,by <br /> alth aura woCo notified not <br /> b the Community Development <br /> placed oallotted <br /> time.tHHby the City Council had n e mbeenatt fulfilled within thea of <br /> iuld w also notified C t t the mat of the dilapidated building <br /> would b scheduled he the rtment000f Com a July thatts the <br /> he <br /> proceedewlN demolition Department <br /> structure. <br /> At that meeting the Council was informed that thed the now <br /> wished to <br /> otuse <br /> structurethe for commercial storage. They in owner <br /> conduction <br /> to net inspections verbally <br /> t compliance. Mr.H rd <br /> was duly notified and he agr d to a scheduled inspectionby <br /> City personnel. <br /> r said upon arriving a 122 i the agreed <br /> • Hon anded scheduled time, Citing i inepectorsywere nmet aby a of men <br /> @; by leaeturd that hem displaas.denying them to hs. The inspectors rt, informed <br /> e H he was den h Pre <br /> ' In vrew of this development,Mr.Royce a obvious <br /> and the ob vo refusal of <br /> the property wn tse <br /> erty oabate the public nuisance either byrehabilitation <br /> i r by removal.of theu <br /> dilapidated structure,re,theDepartment of Community <br /> recommendsill <br /> opment authorization by the City Council to hermit th <br /> x` <br /> City <br /> Administration <br /> prooeeA with demolition f the structure located <br /> at h <br /> Mr Hurdareviewed his objections to the demolition order and said <br /> felt that t h former inspections had been made legally,so none <br /> E Nese reports were admvasable.o theCouncil.the aim said there i. ere twelve r fifteen people at his proopertet e ed. me also <br /> l o inspect h building and they were all a said he a <br /> (,. had• ea g that time, <br /> iCouncilman Mdchelson asked of Mr.Hurd would willing t allow a <br /> et ,buildingonaturally,ino,he hadpreparedethe mea f it were p to t e, <br /> etc., said no he had building t e if <br /> for burningco <br />�?S ago,a it would not t thefire code e <br /> t this• time <br /> Morris,Les said he.was leasing the building for purposes of dead s <br /> „t age,which was in the basement. He told.the Council he cemy would <br /> anyC C <br /> Councilman or City official t m to the <br /> ilding a <br /> 1., <br /> long as he u as leasing et.. <br /> Al Van Dyke 1 po ed the demolition. <br /> Councilman Eta.I. time a O d she gFwa she uld not vote for or commercial <br /> at this If <br /> it as 1 the building w she <br /> would <br /> w for c lisp d immediately.t back tresidence, uld want it�morlvshed imnedia[ely. <br /> Councilmenlj Moved Councilman ac corded by CO 1 Michelson adopt <br /> Resolution N 1044 as follows: <br /> to sixteenthday of July,1975the City o£Everett <br /> ilding <br /> Official or his duly authorised representative <br /> r <br /> reqs at d the Everett City <br /> uncal i regular public meeting order the demolition afr a <br /> struc- <br /> ture <br />� as specified i that certain NOTICE OP UNSAFE HUILOING(H)dated the <br /> a <br />