Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> January li,1976 <br /> COUNCIL BILL NO.76-9 <br /> First Reading. • <br /> • <br /> An the C provided b <br /> Everett ordinance <br /> Titled,0 map <br /> 3572(south of 90th street S.E., <br /> west of Bothell 9 ey <br /> HEARING <br /> ted that 1n knownparently during <br /> 1960 an n n adopted zoning <br /> what was the process of a adopting this t annexationlegal property.educe f p <br /> • oaring the Council h been a <br /> this ordinance <br /> declared invalid o 5hochey ra <br /> adopted r the zoning classification establish.by <br /> t - <br /> vious Ordinance 3770 in 1960. The Planning Commissionhad <br /> the-Council. <br /> held • <br /> gu i aetrvdthe proposedinuoas presented to the <br /> d- gamedeen <br /> • <br /> Allend.rferan attoeney,said be was represent..a Mr.R.A.Ensign <br /> who was a resident in the <br /> rea involved.mr. <br /> ,but haopposedl <br /> lendorfet said he was not <br /> sed ttoccupancy <br /> is ial u suggested the Council establish in • <br /> thisapro9.sed ordinance a performanceindusin atrial B-2 zone,such as stipulating that the operation or a d not run after <br /> 6.0 <br /> P.M.,no operation on weekends,and the noise volume lmust be complied with • <br /> under State statute. seconded • <br /> • <br /> l Langus to • <br /> : Moved by.Councllman Michelson, by nc lade 1 <br /> tthe public his time, ear g nd authorize first readingnofCouncil Bill 76-10 <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes excePt Councilman yrnch who <br /> Reading., was excused. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Motion Carried <br /> COUNCIL BILL NO.76-10 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> 8 First <br /> • <br /> rtoning classifications fcertain of the <br /> city s originally estab9o <br /> established Ordinance 3]0,passedA August 2,1960. <br /> EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT(Council Bill No.76-11) <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Moved by <br />• Rucker, <br /> and a t fortheESO <br /> overhead power installation at Forest Park for the swimming pool. <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes except councilman Finch who <br />