Laserfiche WebLink
January 38.,.:1976 <br /> Moved by C cilman abar seconded be CouncilmanfieAldcof <br /> t to the <br /> mo- <br /> tion <br /> o <br /> 5nith9units of 185unito, <br /> an <br /> e under Item No. <br /> d <br /> 12uof new construction to 15 units,ande a firstpriority,50 <br /> existingu units to3i existing units,aexistingf units for families <br /> to 5 units fforf y;u ofpriority,change BO new <br /> uc <br /> t 15, fd under herd priority,change 17 existing units to <br /> Roll w with all councilmen voting Yes e t Councilmen Finch und <br /> Rucker <br /> who voted no. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Roiih ealmnnvtinnnmtXopt Hlm12 Aldot,r n <br /> daebetnw <br /> voted yes. <br /> motion Failed <br /> RESOLUTION (Council Bill 761-25) <br /> t to <br /> Be1107,Councilman <br /> i the language <br /> langgungeeused ed y h reviousrresolution thatwas <br /> defeated,with the following c <br /> Under Item 2. conn ctionexisting <br /> [stiingshousing to 1 and 125 units of new <br /> ty: ° 8 to 30 existing units for <br /> Under fixe[priority: <br /> f50 amilies130 existing units, <br /> Under Priority T 40 units of new construction to 20 units. <br /> Under Priority Three: 17 existing units to 20 existing units. <br /> Moved by Councilman Rucker,seconded by Councilman h to am thets motion <br /> new <br /> construction, 9 change 184 iOne,of i5 rexi tin nits to e 70 and 20 r existing units <br /> 2011:,00nstruc1 on, £families to 10 units,sand Priority Two,20 <br /> of and P Three,17 existingunits100. <br /> Moved by Councilman 0L00h,seconded by Councilor Michelsonto <br /> amend <br /> end Cher <br /> change I 00110:s f 00 units <br /> ni <br /> amendmentllws,oandd eliminate the cwording,afirst,second and third priority,e <br /> and just list as 1,2 and 3. <br /> Roll w called with all Councilmen voting Y except Councilmen Aldcroft, <br /> Langusaand R who voted 1 Motion <br /> Rucker an Rucker,, r seconded by Councilman Ebert ttoorichange the <br /> languagMoved e inthethird families,)and <br /> read,100 existing units for familior es <br /> (including four large amilies,)oa additional existing <br /> elderly should a f the above at t be implementer.units <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yea. <br /> 1 <br /> Motion Carried <br /> was lmend o original amendment changing Gipson the number <br /> of nits with <br /> ell 1Covncilmen vOtingeyea except Councilman Gipaoh'who voted no <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Moved by Councilman Rucker,seconded by Councilman Langus to cease debate. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yea except Councilman Gipson who <br /> voted n. <br /> Motion Carried <br />