Laserfiche WebLink
1'1 <br /> 3s <br /> � January zR 1] <br /> Movseconded by councilman Ala amend the mo <br /> aceto Councilman Ebtem s 2 75 u of existing housing t 185 units,a <br /> kchangefnew I construction to 1 its and change under first priority,50 <br /> existin1units-unitseto135 ex ing units,and from 0 existing unitsfor families <br /> to uc <br /> 3 nits f family; second priority,°existing new construe- <br /> : 17 o 15. <br /> .1 <br /> Rucker n to 15;a d with <br /> third c votingxcep Co Fi <br /> k called <br /> h 11 C <br /> gyea a nch and <br /> who <br /> Motion carries <br /> oil as sues�ncne main motion t roeoaea r ng a ebe�inwea <br /> with all C c v ung n Aldcroft,L h° <br /> voted Y Failed <br /> RESOLUTION (Council Bill 761-25) <br /> Moved by Councilman Aldcroft,seconded by CountpreviousnEbert toadoptR that was <br /> olution <br /> 307,encompassing the language used i <br /> on <br /> defeated,with g <br /> following changes: <br /> : <br /> Under Item 2. 75 units <br /> f e 2i. ho <br /> Musing to 180,and 125 units of new <br /> construc <br /> to <br /> Under first priority: 50[o130 existing units,8 to 30 existing units for <br /> large families. <br /> d. Under Priority T 90 units of newtructicn[ 20 unite. <br /> Under Priority Three. 1,existing units to 20 existing unite. <br /> Moved by Councilman Rucker,seconded by councilman Minchto <br /> amend the motion <br /> to 20 units of new <br /> construction,ande Item 2 to changeBPriority One, <br /> existing <br /> existing nunits t 70 existing <br /> units,construction,existing <br /> units of families <br /> o ilies to 10 u a Priority <br /> Two,20 <br /> of nd P i y Three,1]ne sting u 100. <br /> Councilman R nch3sseconded by C x Micheson to amend the <br /> amendment ed Cto c read:priorities f above 200 its <br /> follows,and change <br /> wording,first,second and third priority, <br /> re <br /> and as j t list as 1,2 and 3.e <br /> Rall was <br /> u <br /> called with all Councilmen voting Y except Councilmen Aldcroft, <br /> Langusand Rucker who voted no. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Moved byCouncilman Rucker,seconded by Councilman Ebert t change <br /> the <br /> lde'nthe third priority toead,louexisting units for families s <br /> (including four large families,)and additional existing unrfore <br /> elderly should an of the a of be implemented. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> RollwuneC3amend v0o[inhyeznap memenaC anping tMhe vnweitt'noo£."it' <br /> with <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Moved by Councilmen Rucker,seconded by Councilman Langus to cease debate. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yea except Councilman Gipson who <br /> voted no. <br /> Motion Carried <br />