My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1976/05/05 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1976/05/05 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:23:10 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 8:34:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
5/5/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
139 <br /> May 5,1976 <br /> FUND GROSS EMPLOYEE NET EMPLOYERDEPARTMENT <br /> 101 Park and Recreation 5 10,,290.35 $4,653. P 59 5 11 6.76$3,144.95 <br /> 110 Library 9,418.52 2,455.04 6.963.48 1,891.33 <br /> 120 Street 14,951.16 4,262.37 10,688.79 3,428.73 <br /> 130 Manpower Pool 17,669.64 3 198.214 3 171.4) ,998.97 <br /> 199 Bed.Shared Revenue 230.40 68.02 <br /> 404 Sewer 8,651.62 2,954.92 5,696:70 1,985.45 <br /> 410 Water 20,025.18 <br /> 5 5,005.32 15,019.86 4,594.80 <br /> 4 <br /> Sanitation 214 0.00 00:00 0.00 <br /> t425 9.01 3,889.67 10,340. 3,296.21 <br /> 501 Equip...A a1 1],]45.26 2,252.56 5,492.70 1,769.54 <br /> City Totals 83 6.79 974,132.18 9235,914.61 549,959.30 <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting y except C croft <br /> and Gipson who e excused,and Councilman Rucker who was absent. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> HOUSING PROGSAM CONTINUED <br /> Moved by Councilman <br /> cu <br /> Ebert,seconded by Councilman Kinct m <br /> Kinch <br /> agenda today Council Bill 765-132 and postpone it.until Way 12, <br /> 1976. <br /> Roll es <br /> ncilmen <br /> croftwas andcalled G psonwith all who wereCexcused,nand CouncilmancRuckerua <br /> who was <br /> absent. Motion Carried <br /> ALLEY PARKING PERMIT AMENDMENT (Council Bill 765-133) <br /> le Telephone do ested t <br /> hat the <br /> alley service dinnebeammened ta exempt utilities <br /> from paEingt threw eapproximately600 vehicles <br /> in the sproadicker on these <br /> vehicles <br /> cost the company thousands <br /> would <br /> dollars. <br /> commented to <br /> fetselfw it eman-hours spent <br /> n getting t tickers on all the vehicles t a. cau <br /> the big problem. <br /> 11859 Several Councilmen felt t 9would$11 not be fair t the•othef business <br /> 19.82 le o had purchased t stickers.if.t utilities would be <br /> 32.82 parked right next to them in an alley and not baying paid for Lhe <br /> 76.20 sticker. <br /> 83.51 <br /> 54.21 <br /> 62.93 President Gipson returned to the meeting at this time. <br /> 26.16Dick Thompson,city Attorney,suggested that t utilities,if their <br /> 34.62 vehicles were well-markedsuch as thetelephone comp..,e <br />.3.19 could <br /> coulr.dee possibly <br /> pay was <br /> f9 involved,b o the issued thee.stickers. <br /> felt his w fee <br /> dnsolution t t not hole <br /> D14.31 <br /> 39.73 Moved by Councilman Rucker,seconded by Councilman <br /> Cou cilmanrttht the <br /> 132.53 alley park permit ordinance be a t ea <br /> 609.95 utilities to ay the permit fee their vehicles long e <br /> h <br /> vehices le an painted,butthat no st swould <br /> 10 beissued tocompanies. <br /> es. <br /> 011 x c lea wi[h 0tdc�fes F nceiman <br /> Lang,vaa�noaabatainpa,aa�a�conneilmar.Al o w n was pxrna a. <br /> Motion Carried • <br /> •• <br /> r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.