My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1976/10/27 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1976/10/27 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:26:04 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 8:43:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
10/27/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P*" <br /> 28 <br /> October 27,1976 <br /> southerly c ship pier structure(depict,on drawing nee <br /> 2,4,5 and 8,is to be shortened to 600 fee in length.and changed <br /> a 105-tg <br /> from an 80-foot wide pier with T a em approach structure: o <br /> foot wide p abutting against aland tfill extending its full length. <br /> Fill x ser tune wil be changed from timber a bulk7 <br /> heads aced dikes,as depicted on drawing sheets 5e an <br /> d 7 <br /> (similar truck-placed <br /> n performed nue Boat Launchante- <br /> project"f u retention c spoils from-the ofAEngineer a1976 ma <br /> Hance drdging)ent <br /> d. Depth of basin dredging g will b reduced a btom elevation of <br /> n <br /> (-)40.0 MLLW to(-)36.0 Lwhereby the total volumef drdgingre- <br /> meins unchanged. <br /> ma [ed that im' fill area remain unchanged,n <br /> i tending,t o easterlytwidening o e dredged channel/basin.otThe <br /> original w separation between theedge o£ fill and the dredged <br /> channel wassuggested by o oil ConsultantoeisP a againstab <br /> failure. uba quently,as alternative construction <br /> s been <br /> devisd which will chieveuproper a opea ability watho .ss of <br /> dredged basin area which would occur under the original concept. <br /> The modification of permitted usage :.e which the requests ieludedcled in an amendment to the existing Substantial Development Perm <br /> is inclusion of additional usagewording"SC Fabricating anLAssem- <br /> bly Yard." understanding <br /> ude tandiaas that the usages envisaged City <br /> staff i issuing substantial DevelopmentPermit specifically in- <br /> cluded t following: <br /> a. Delivery of woodchips t site by trucks and rail cars. <br /> Dumping and's[ocnhpoing of hchips. oma Y bulk Recover,and transporting o chips by c whip <br /> Eoading of chis i ships by p equipmentbon loading tower. <br /> d. Loading <br /> handling marshalling <br /> storage yard,and/or <br /> tic <br /> f. General Margo pier'1for 9berthing loading <br /> and/or unloading vessels <br /> handling <br /> General-purposeq. general and/or special s <br /> structural steel,a mobiles,etc. <br /> We suggest thatthea added usage term(whether it be as name in the pre- <br /> ceding paragraph,orah ch wording whimay be deemed more ap fopri- <br /> te)should e ±sssuch activities as fabrication of(a)offshore <br /> 71300 <br /> oil-drilling platforms. (b)modular units au.as pre-assembled power <br /> ing <br /> pAlaskan Nosth Slostations, assembled <br /> pe and elsewhere,,and(0water for <br /> bargee end...ler activi- <br /> ties requiring substantial operational area with direct access to deep <br /> water. nforThe site a E rantvwillLbehtheddressed in the proposed fabrications pend- <br /> ing applicationd similar <br /> Kaiser Steel Company,nofDoffahorewoil drilling pisiforms,a <br /> wIn conformance with ork. Guidelines,a nether thetP klist has <br /> £or <br /> develorpme�ntaofe porton Avenue determining whether <br /> and Port's xpnsion <br /> as now proposed t be modified will result in a ifiaantly greater <br /> impact upon the quality of the environment thanthe project a 'IVnd <br /> in the sting substantial Development t Acopy of t Environ- <br /> mental <br /> mental Checklist attached as Exhibit <br /> O. <br /> The Port <br /> d <br /> staff aCommissioners have carefully reviewed the proposed <br /> project modifications and the environmental checklist,a pursuant <br /> thereto have made a determination that(a)the wf11 nottdeae) <br /> n increased adverse impact o e quality n <br /> the proposal will result in an improved project facility environment, <br /> dtmore <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.