Laserfiche WebLink
I.:.. 162: <br /> June <br /> 1,19]9 <br /> - B-.2 property lying directly <br /> behind xh uildingev Evergreen W aideproperty being west <br /> o£Ba Prospect v <br /> _urposeeofna owing construction ofea third build- <br /> in . The rezone <br /> o for the Village Shopping Centex a Pafamil 1 <br /> . id to lthe no B-3 zoning and is to the <br /> northwest i - „singlenfamily a "theeast ris add£-. <br /> I toneae A- zone,predominantlyEvacan Further he s an -1 <br /> I, a n single family a to thesouthis - z with lowB <br /> density dmultiple family development and t the awest 3 is a B-2 zone and <br /> l commercialuse. a applicant is loping he re foot esquare,Shopping <br /> Center. It The <br /> = of developing <br /> s Village building, <br /> ad buildings a consists <br /> additional <br /> said t 19Planning co 1 n h <br /> ns• i'dering t stimon0 th from all'p rties,the.B and voted 5 on1 t after <br /> filed an appeal with the city <br /> Clerkg beforecouncil. Mr.sho y y he favors <br /> denial requesting <br /> at for rezone. <br /> James <br /> • w h-demandef ailfsho ping Wexler, <br /> flthis n that <br /> this <br /> unless the tproperty in question is incorporatedinthepro- <br /> posedshopping c a landlocked and devoid of value.n <br /> • Shockey denied this. Bllendoerfer said L a planned <br /> Mx. ill a buffer zone and that there v <br /> retail <br /> rgh that <br /> there <br /> vp e v war also said the Planning Commission <br /> I f failed t enter£findings 9ofefact. Mx.Shockey al denied this. s <br /> ( Councilman ensad h 11 b off <br /> Rainier d d <br /> o <br /> b certain there was no unduehardship on thisneighborhood. <br /> i:17,1i'I{ b-hamplon,chairmanf the Commission,urged itto <br /> d this request <br /> he felt that because <br /> y 70 foot wide <br /> 1 private dede c d be parking1 tdead- <br /> endd would be difficult traffic in the area. <br /> F1Ean odrtwert t the north of the proposed rezone,e, <br /> o <br /> b <br /> 1 gt h e anthe <br /> f Woodsman n oar <br /> k ark- <br /> green heaid already problems with p m heeng £ shopping center "allowed- he ouldbeven <br /> i more parking problem. <br /> J <br /> N mr¢ businesses said when this project w completed there would be <br /> 'II.I elthe ai <br /> hopping center us access t s <br /> ea Evergreen front- <br /> :1'1- Way which i would be more feasible k nuo have 22ebusinesses <br /> :1' n <br /> 9 evergreen Way with cars coming in and out of each business. <br /> Iby <br /> Councilman seconded by Councilman <br /> public hearing and r city attorney <br /> to pre a ordinance <br /> 1 grant h requestedCouncilman k ki what effect 1 hovet <br /> heVeoWay Study <br /> this rezone were <br /> allowed and Boolovs,.said <br />'9 it would no change the study o have any n <br />' hltecwith all councilmen voting yes except councilmen i g <br /> I . wovodno and Councilmanberhas <br /> excused. <br /> , Motion carried <br /> F'.r1 t; <br />