Laserfiche WebLink
g <br /> Tune 29,1977 <br /> responsible official andthe court to justify this requirement. <br />'ea 3. Residents both to and ate steam£ `hr <br /> oposed <br /> development a expressed the e <br /> a <br /> embodied <br /> fiint proposal,sufficient o warrant an airing <br /> nsaid concern into Beprocess. <br /> dReahthe a representing Mr. Alis <br /> said he would <br /> like <br /> ✓ in e record <br /> llant wasuli <br /> Hillis <br /> Homes, He p pictures <br /> showin the s <br /> veaid tie poftwo <br /> hundred acre area in t Vis a ravel pito one <br /> side and amotorcycle t and he ought these homes would be e <br /> an d property involved was zoned R-3 3 <br /> omultiple family could be ndbe c <br /> r tteao the total 110n units e15]proposed ed <br /> e sibthey fa!his as n ethan amo- <br /> o impact on the neighborhood. <br /> Councilman rnk lthere been <br /> a study made of the a <br /> rea <br /> regarding aiagendHenning said to knowledge no extensive <br /> `' ay b however,there hasbeen lot of erosion in <br /> the <br /> area caused by drainage'piobleme. <br /> xhockeyalso felt <br /> that the drainage was a problem because of <br /> much <br /> erosion in the area. <br /> • Heavy felt the drainage w` t a problem because n developing <br /> a plat he law does no allow the drainage being�aroblem in as mus„ <br /> aa e developer m e drainage on firs his property. <br /> The platcould no approvedunless prodf was shown that a drain- <br /> age would not run off on adjacent areas. <br /> Councilman Moore asked wh re opposed t Mr.Heavy <br /> oeira-r aLdititral coetsito thedevelopera y t pose un- <br /> Councilman Tuckett asked-i re was criteria f e n <br /> and Mr. hockey r request was decided t own merit <br /> 1I and actually there phadabe o established criteria set by law. <br /> Councilman n¢ d isethere re s an the <br /> new development and Mr. hockey said as far as he knew therer none. <br /> Bill Roberta of 7106 Upper Ridge Roadsuggested a r made at <br /> Hardison Roadratherthe use bof 76th or <br /> 73rd s oWine complained f here openditches on both <br /> IF sides o 76thnccenn cony,.,Stree d: no placeetto walkse in the road <br /> privateor.on property. addition o homes <br /> there wouldbeh f andmore children in the area. <br /> Beverly <br /> Christianson,development <br /> Charlie Tutton, ha Roberts, <br /> ` <br /> Carol <br /> Williams Wood,allresidents <br /> the pokeagainstthe <br /> proposedd velopmentbecause ofthe additionalt traffic problems,, be <br /> the <br /> rwere <br /> ttake <br /> care <br /> the cars and ed <br /> riansand becauseof the drainageinthe area. <br /> biccenkThompeonCity Attorney,reminded the C Council they w not looking <br /> at platr eheyd id n ether this a should <br /> not <br /> developed <br /> db dealing with <br /> if an <br /> required a if the identifiesproblems aa <br /> Potential solutions: <br /> • <br /> Reid ehockey then briefly d how the staff had made their deci- <br /> teh statements the proposal <br /> 4 ` Heavy <br /> woouldnot makemooe h a again moderate impactonthe area. <br /> i.y <br /> F1 <br />