Laserfiche WebLink
October 5,1977 313 <br /> nchey said in contacting vel he indicated that he would <br /> bappeasically <br /> decisiReview Committee on. <br /> no order <br /> eMp expedite <br /> appeal matters <br /> since Environmental is <br /> rt.,rehear e item. hearing, at themt tonight for a rehearing. <br /> However,if is atcoun- <br /> cil <br /> said the proponents <br /> had presented an environmental checklist includ- <br /> ing transportation cirools,power or natural gas, culation,f <br /> ation systems,water,sewer, <br /> storm water,drainage a.solid waste. Mst of the <br /> were <br /> answered in the checklist with traffic being the onlyamajorjorssues problem. <br /> Hillis p an EPS would cost m of 015,000. The <br /> planning disagrees as to the cost. <br /> o-date it i 004 p With <br /> considerablysless. <br /> present a the cost should be <br /> aPeavey, for the <br /> id <br /> he felt 1' '1 r h traffic w <br /> signs to discourage through traffic so that <br /> moo1e impact. th stop Sig.and <br /> the i act is not <br /> Councilman Janke.asked if 1100 u d be built undresent <br /> zoning er ao v replied yes. kgness .h they we a <br /> any traffic on Upper Ridge Road. . <br /> Carl Rogersof 3x33 76th a asked i r improv- <br /> ing <br /> evede Ridge Road oplansd£orn Road and Mr.improvements <br /> cit Engineer, <br /> eked if xhombuillis would <br /> thave to re improving Upper Ridge Rogers ...E <br /> and then Ua Attorney, <br /> replied the <br /> Road <br /> with Presented <br /> atO vel o the ploatfi Councilman r ' could include thatam <br /> f he posed t prpossl dknw 1000 <br /> e awU cn read mspond Jo Williams of 337 3complaints concerning the Mrosure of <br /> exi <br /> ng residences to <br /> ab <br /> fic on Upper Ridge Road b or solution <br /> Veralene residents <br /> andfromindustrial fworkers seeking to avoid the dasam E green inter <br /> Reverly Christiansen the development also I11 <br /> Dick m explainedwas _night as far as an EIS statement, �' <br /> tlill havecome back to the council with his i and the <br /> council had <br /> final decision on dheresiddecescou <br /> lbuilt p aornAlis es <br /> ydevelopment,hw ver,would have to have find approval of thecouncil. <br /> pvc neanosm.imus,seconded y Councilman nlac=oft that the <br /> Roll <br /> licaith lled <br /> en voting yea a Councilmen Gipson <br /> and werexused. <br /> Motion carried <br />