Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 323 <br /> October 19,1977 <br /> councilman Gipson asked if Mr.9.ue felt the improvement was acceptable <br /> 1 <br /> to the residents in the area now after the drainage and traffic prob- <br /> lems had been taken care of,and Mr.due replied they were still opposed <br /> 61'r.tShheol'yt arespo'rt'eTbo'the council he felt there was no problem as far <br /> as traffic was concerned at either the Baker Drive.or the Bayview Lane <br /> intersection with Mukilteo Boulevard. <br /> Jim Michell of 4927 Bayview f elt there should be fewer lot <br /> thes which would <br /> meanenvironment there would of be the nfewer ghborcars,hood.less traf f ic and less of an impact on <br /> ei <br /> Tle'gr:2't1.X°°n2r1:z.VsztTnr= <br /> roads in the area. <br /> the narrowness of e <br /> Charles Newcombe of 4712 Baker objected and presented a petition with <br /> 67 signatures protesting the subdivision. <br /> Councilman Moore stated he felt the intersection was dangerous. He felt <br /> the plat should be cut down to to lots and a road brought out to Mukil- • <br /> tee Boulevard through lot 13. <br /> h':1V.4YZImtrP1T:'Pora'2':11=itl!'Y councilman <br /> Moore <br /> t°cl'''Publ <br /> ic •„, <br /> • <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes. , <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Mo11 1 • <br /> .vee by Councilman Moore,seconded by Councilman Lang.that the re- 1 <br /> quest of Towne or Country West,Inc.for preliminary approval of Bay- <br /> view Manor subdivision plat be denied on the basis of public safety <br /> and drainage that would be caused by development of this particular plat. <br /> Councilman Juckett spoke against the motion 9uoting from R.C.W.which 1111• <br /> states.the city,to.or county legislative body shall inquire'nto <br /> '1'61 <br /> the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment <br /> of the subdivision and dedication. /t shall determine if appropriate <br /> provisions are made for,but not limited to the public health,safety <br /> and general welfare,for open spaces,drainage ways,streets,alleys, . <br /> other public ways,water supplies,sanitary waste,parks,playgrOunds, <br /> sites for schools and schoolgrounds and shall consider all other rele- <br /> vant facts and determine thethe public interest will be served , <br /> by the subdivision and dedication. /f it finds that the proposed plat • • <br /> dOes not make such appropriate provisions or that the public use and m <br /> • <br /> interest will not be served,then the legislative body may disprove <br /> the proposed plat.. He felt the developer was taking care of the drain- <br /> age problem nd aof the unsafe intersection at Bayview Lane. The request <br /> for additionaal ccess on Mukilteo Boulevard is against the policy of the <br /> Traffic Engineering Department of the city. Therefore he felt he could • <br /> not vote for denial of this plat. <br /> oilRoll was called on the motion and with Councilmen Aldcroft,Langus, <br /> wand Michelson voting yes Councilmen',eke.and Gipson voting <br /> nO. <br /> Motion carried <br /> BSCOG SUBREGION.COMM/TTEE REPORT <br /> Mayor John Enbom of Mountlake Terrace gave a brief overview of the sub- <br /> regional committee of the Puget sound Council of Coverments. He urged <br /> the tiltcouno appoint someone to take the former Mayor's place on the <br /> board. <br />