Laserfiche WebLink
Z January 4,19]9 <br /> SULTAN RIVER ALTERNATIVES WITH uo(C9'/712-454) <br /> Haglund• <br /> x Council t f had been <br /> the• vs received <br /> River project. He said they were requesting input from the Council as to <br /> their thoughts and recommendations on these alternatives. He briefly re- <br /> viewed them as follows: <br /> the Lice s <br /> on 1Plan and <br /> tined <br /> hydroelectric potential <br /> o bhe Sultan River have been examined. As a re- <br /> aaunder consideration and are <br /> referred to herein as Alternatives 1 and 2. <br /> Alternative 1 follows the of the Licensed Project,Piants 1 and 2 as sea concept b.x would replace Powerhouse No.3. <br /> as consideredProject, <br /> t jectdownstream development on the <br /> - <br /> lta alternative,presented <br /> Alt <br /> • ocne�lA and 1B,differ in the rtheeoiex of ecific - <br /> tion after <br /> • the studies <br /> cof these oda otherpossibilities development are completed. <br /> rep- <br /> resented <br /> the two variatiOns presented. <br /> In yAlternative 1A,the downstream would be accomplished with <br /> two dams with relatively <br /> h dlmiles leading <br /> t <br /> house. Dam No. would be edesuconfluence <br /> Chaplain Creek active-power • <br /> nd the <br /> Sultan <br /> A tunnel would then convey water to miles downstream from the oPowerhouse ei about Sou and <br /> connectwould a short power w <br /> pow tunnel to Powerhouse o.4. <br /> • <br /> Ate dam 1 am a long conduit <br /> would be <br /> led. Dam No. <br /> 5 a short <br /> ulldbh distance upstream <br /> s backing <br /> the <br /> • the o Powerhouse water up to Powerhouse No.2. 5 relativelyoi g power tunnel <br /> Alternative 2 involves raising Culmback Dem and Spada <br /> ative and dive Er <br /> the Sultan <br /> he <br /> River Licensed <br /> the eOlney dCreek basin and back into the Sultan River about 1.5 <br /> miles downstream of power eSpadalLakeewith t Powerhouse p.1 creek. null consist <br /> Thea hargmileenfro tunnel leading canalear Olney es <br /> ing into Reservoir No.2. A short conduit eaahe <br /> • Alternative o..,Powerhouse No.3,in manner similar to that proposed Rfor ZPlant dNo.4 of <br /> He said e had s t <br /> problems w the alternatives <br /> does not go to Lake n itc roblemscf ywbecause <br /> waterxgua add, <br /> tional costs <br /> ith plan was <br /> othe ysuchof eth cobe <br /> verett. At present <br /> yl water flows by gi=v- <br /> dif <br /> would <br /> emore <br /> expensive <br /> a s ppage of the flowiof water to the citizens ofplants had a problem, t <br /> urallY therecouldbe <br /> President <br /> ethe fmin time • <br /> and then n en the agenda meetingied the orkshop-session would recess for <br /> would <br /> be carerecon t <br /> en a <br /> and then <br /> portion of the workshop wouldbecontiued. his • <br />