Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 41 <br /> February 8,1978 <br /> • <br /> SNOHOMISH WATER CONTRACT <br /> atTl U es pine tot torr due Smnfhs C <br /> and Tvm pe,telam q g neer,°from the y nohomash. r' <br /> Mithxaaglund Said the Snohomish historywater goes back as far as 1962 <br /> waterwscussions regarding <br /> three years there have been tt <br /> 1 <br /> about s homishocJanuary <br /> letter <br /> was re- <br /> . ceived from the esting a <br /> On <br /> to city <br /> consideration rtl7thaponeallw received Snohomishe city <br /> h asking seran two meet- <br /> he council along <br /> Moore,Administrative <br /> e As-sistant Thompson As a ntAttrn ones.• <br /> Hesaid the majorexperienced <br /> long standing problems t <br /> he <br /> [city has ache r <br /> he c contract <br /> a)ewe did said <br /> wan that recommendedwas <br /> t <br /> should relate <br /> rge atecontocostso vice and W)should bereduce oaereduc[rall revenue, <br /> rates <br /> Questions that would have to ansrane would be" <br /> the DoeCthe cito ty provide e long range edthe of city <br /> vide water for the long range needs o noh <br /> o <br /> - 1M1 f the city a awiato provide water, what r under <br /> ) what sthecitypeenterina9 term contractsuch ae thirty y a requested by Snohomish]" <br /> t ix b Oneha ih�co <br /> e ! ae be <br /> • <br /> a g a ont s�onDmaaM1 dna non d t nor°i g rm nonsnra <br /> felt that <br /> ing [sifAw Snohomish,i the <br /> committee _ <br /> nance• eyerhaete rather than a r,Scott,etc. unset as was being done present with oPUD, <br /> CouncilmanMoved by Michelson,second.b cihnan Langus to limit <br /> the discussion <br /> nwtoday to rate whether rwe ill sell water to Snohomish <br /> if <br /> a.for how long. • <br /> e fit the city should s oro t ardo a <br /> =ares so they ul be a uiraple for all a ti rues r di structs, water <br /> Councilman <br /> Overstreet spokeagainst <br /> motion because <br /> felt c -lhdtomake the decision on how y weregoing to sell water toall districts. <br /> ts. <br /> call• <br /> , Roll was <br /> on <br /> except Overstreet and Gipson who voted <br /> Councilmen Baker,Overstwith a ed <br /> no. hl <br /> men',Ming <br /> Motion Carried <br /> lund <br /> thatSSnohomishen said would double tconsumption <br /> the Fru: set <br /> forth they were! tional water would Fir con of <br /> isery They rate o£iadarefore me <br /> p with a rate of seven centsepere100acubic sfeet to the eCityeof Snohomish. <br /> The <br /> recommendationo£f committee was <br /> • tp )beestablishedoentering into <br /> contracts y involving <br /> the <br /> esteishment e at tilscht tee with 5C° <br /> eus- <br /> er <br /> empire. tfais b) date _ceaent h the Scott,Weyerhaeuser and FUD contracts, That <br /> a new <br />