Laserfiche WebLink
83 <br /> March ,1978 <br /> Coset <br /> formpliance w underthecove <br /> all not relieve the <br /> erator of <br /> the further <br /> exercise of due care and caution a further ycircumstancvehicle emshall require. <br /> The unlawful operation of a vehicle in excess of the maximum <br /> provided in thys section at h <br /> cumstances described hall be prima evidenceo operation <br /> oint of operation and <br /> of a motor vehicle an a reckless mane e e <br /> y thethereof.under <br /> operator the . <br /> Roll was called with all c Councilmen B <br /> voting yes except cil <br /> Pope and Overstreet who were excused. aker, <br /> Motion carried <br /> RESOLUTION CONTINUED(CB 783-89( <br /> Ron <br /> nn,Traffic <br /> itinier,said t t Mukiiteo Blvd.ivexperiencing <br /> neaccident Te with neecidets iingehiclenVlingfaster than the advisory pd. nboulevard m vehicles <br /> taccesdever of lopment rate with almost 6 access points per mile.The s accesspoints restricted sight distances com- <br /> bine t form potential hazardto bouievardmo s. Con <br /> uing develope- <br /> ment resulting in growing traffic volumes isincreasing t ishazad. Th <br /> warningabundance of wigns effect aryin speed limit osthan <br /> 30 MPH for almost 858 of Mukilteo Boulevard. The 35 MPH liwitapplies <br /> t0 y SOH of the boulevard. <br /> He <br /> d the <br /> Traffic <br /> Engineering <br /> requestsng h to <br /> Council limit 0 x " ceBo Boulevard Federal <br /> A <br /> 0 0 limits. x3tes cveeds <br /> and <br /> rawninthe <br /> avragesp [hillhilenspeed <br /> approaching <br /> to V <br /> slow oadr e deceleration <br /> the corner. The result will bbe increased w eng sign and <br /> increase safety w will affect both t svlng and regular <br /> motoristsif it is <br /> ee reducing pdthe <br /> leconomical <br /> Baaentr a n beemployed o kilted Boulevard to reduce the <br /> nlbeef <br /> accints and accident rate and any forgivenessbyMukilteoedto an errnt ms <br /> t. <br /> Councsluan Aldcroft felt <br /> The fullcouncil should be in end <br /> action <br /> Counccilmanthis <br /> Michelson to delayreason <br /> awhich <br /> was <br /> d <br /> proposedreeolutvonfar30 y. <br /> by '., <br /> Roll was called with Councilmen Aldere£t and Michelson voting yes and <br /> Councilman Langus and <br /> streetexcused. ips voting no.Councilmen Baker,Pope and Over- <br /> were Motion LostMoved <br /> gr <br /> posed rby esolution L g ,seconded by Councilman Gipson to p the pro li <br /> Councilman <br /> was <br /> man Roll <br /> called ChCouncilman Langus and Gipson voting yes and ncil- <br /> ArtandMichelson voting g no Councilmen Baker, pend Overstreet eetwere excused. <br /> Motion Lost <br /> 3Ys pncipLne AotveneC0naed by Councilmanzangua todelay for <br /> Roll was all <br /> Overstreet awhodwerewith <br /> excused. <br /> Councilmen voting yes a cept Baker,lope and 5'._I. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> ,ra;l <br /> VF 1 <br />