Laserfiche WebLink
. , <br /> 146 <br /> April 26,1978 <br /> .. 1 <br /> . 4. liability should read 3100,000 per individual,300,000 per occurrence and g <br /> P" 50,000 property damage as per Bing County. 1 <br /> 5. section 10. City assnmption of maintenance and operation. That the city 1 <br /> 2' be authorized to and shall assume maintenance when requirements.listed in <br /> P:Ticrol'es:Lvtgcep:teetiZneaTmVint'glatrOcfTc7littscnTe=i:a- 1 <br /> ' tion of the one year maintenance period(as per Ring County)and that <br /> design standards and requirements that assure capability of maintenance 1 <br /> . <br /> . and assumption of maintenance operation by 766 1167 11 1627866 be pub- <br /> . <br /> lished in the procedures manual. a. <br /> 4 . <br /> Pn replying to Mr.Brandvold's suggestions Mr.Henning said he still felt.,. <br /> two year maintenance bond was the wiser. More and more problems crop up not - <br /> t during the first year but in the second and even third year as far as utilities. <br /> a in new plats,etc. He also felt that he did not have enough people to de-. ' <br /> velop a drainage plan as requested by 1.ir.Brandvold within the six month . <br /> period of time. As far as.e amounts of the insurance this was the same <br /> Y amount that was request.and required in all construction contracts,etc: " <br /> 13 for the City of Everett. He said also the city does not have the staff nor I. <br /> pi the technical capabilities to take <br /> 6767 211 of the drainage as suggested. <br /> Mr.Brandvold. . <br /> • <br />. Moved by Councilman Langus,seconded by Councilman Baker that this is de- '• <br />.. clared to be the final reading of Council Bill 782-31 and the City clerk <br />•. is directed to call the.11 for the final disposition of the ordinance. <br /> 1 <br /> • Roll'call: Ayes: Langus,Baker,Gipson,Pope Overstreet <br /> Michelson <br /> • Excused: Aldcroft <br /> •, Ordinance No.514-7B adopted. <br /> COUNCIL BILL 783-111 <br /> B . N...reading: <br /> An ordinance providing for the vacation of the alleys in Block 694,plat <br /> of Everett Land Company's First Addition described as follows: <br /> the alley east of Cedar Street from the south right-of-way <br /> line of the alley south of Hewitt Street and the east-west <br />.. alley north of Pacific. <br />, • <br />• <br />. Lloyd Henning reported that as instructed by the Council they had made an , <br />.. appraisal of the property abutting these alleys and the report had come <br />, in that it had a market value of 566,500. <br /> BJ • <br /> Ted Bahl,the petitioner,felt the appraisal of the property was incor- 1 <br />., rect. He said also the business to be established on the property <br />• 4 <br /> 14 would increase the tax base of the city and would make employment in the <br /> city. So he requeeted the eOuncil grant a lesser amount than the 508- . <br />.• <br />. of the appraised valuation. . <br /> Moved by Councilman Pope,seconded by Councilman Baker that the(Petitioner . <br /> PaY 51.6,625 to the citY as their cost under E.C.W. <br /> Roll was called path Councilmen Pope,Baker,and Gipson voting yes and ' <br /> Councilmen Overstreet,Langus and Michelson voting no. • <br />. • <br />. Moved by Councilman Overstreet,seconded by Councilman Langus that this ie <br />' declared to be the final reading of Council Bill 7B3-111 and the-city Clerk <br /> 4 is directed to call the roll for the final disposition of the ordinance <br /> as amended hy adding section 3 as follows: ''.1 <br /> a , <br />