Laserfiche WebLink
237 <br /> Cute 21,1978 <br /> aa. fnitTe'CR:=TagtdOrfil!:T.'nn n'anaa and nn an'nnnn nna aananna <br /> aa. p'a'Ze':frall.rinag7lareennhnala7..a.Vt=gitarraettdann nearing n'Itn the <br /> CONCLUSICHS OF LAW <br /> a' re=::nTolaraTlandi:ig:tVebTe:TIa=nria%7""nen'nnn <br /> 2. The Draft EIS was issued and circulated by the City in accordance <br /> wiN law. <br /> 3. TaZgigl.EIS meets the requirements of law and is therefore legally <br /> 8. The final RN was issued and circulated by the CitY Fverett in <br /> accordance with law. <br /> 5. The Final&IS did not include substantial changes in the proposal or <br /> significant new information not available at the time the Draft EIS -•; <br /> was circulated and circulation of a new Draft EIS is not necessary to <br /> provide further input or review on the proposal. <br /> 6. The Draft EIS satisfies the requirements imposed in the Diaration <br /> of Significance,and directly addresses the potential impace of the <br /> proposed,project on total housing,thereby including an assessment <br /> of impact on all subcategories of housing,including low income housing. <br /> C. The impacts on housing identified in the Draft EIS are not significant, <br /> serious or direct adverse envirormantal impacts expected to OCCUI in <br /> Snohomish County,Xing County,the City of Everett,or the CIty of <br /> Seattle and tne City oE Everett was therefore not required to circulate r <br /> the Draft EIS to King County or the City of Seattle. <br /> 8. Appropriate and reasonable measures intended to mitigate any adverse <br /> impact on Nusing were adequately considered by the City,but the de- <br /> gree of significance of the expected impact does not justify the im- <br /> position of conditions on the building permit. <br /> 9. The allegations of inadequacy as to the treatment of low Income nousing <br /> in the Draft Els,circulation of the Draft EIS,the existence of <br /> nificant new Information in the Final LIS,and imposition of mitiga- ;r4,. <br /> ilon measures as a condition ot the building permit,made by appellants, <br /> ere non supported by tne testimony or the evidence. <br /> THEREFORE: <br /> Tne CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVERETT adopts the recommendation of the <br /> Environmental Review Commit,e and affirms the decision of the Responsible <br /> Official in finalising tne Environmental Impact statement tor the facility <br /> expansion ot the Boeing Commercial Airplane Company and tne appeals and <br /> relief requested ny the Snohomish County Tenants Union,tne Clients Coun- <br /> cil ot Snonomish County and the Seattle Tenants Union axe hereby denied. . <br /> • <br /> Roll was called witn all councilmen voting yes except Counei1man SiPsee <br /> who was excused. <br /> ,.tion Carrie <br /> ffr <br /> On motion the meeting adjourned at 5:00 pm C <br /> Cler <br /> A <br /> a.approved as printed <br />