My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1978/06/28 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1978/06/28 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:48:47 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:13:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
6/28/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
243 <br /> June 28,1978 <br /> What effect is there on transit planning if the vote is an 1978 or.1979? <br /> 1988 gandvtheonec ley nttla e t 15 months of planniVg fo <br /> wougdonty threeplan. to <br /> e^ 2n g 1978 would <br /> rtive vote P d ac plan n e yea urther ac n 19'!8. pos <br /> thehsvame level e only analyzed of service?one alternative,what are others that willprovide <br /> to <br /> 7 provide the <br /> There.is no other alternative that <br /> ? atadequate cnellsorvi Under system of are likely istesupport probably lost n lelimination of service s.highly likely <br /> ii <br /> 981 <br /> what is the real Issue with the Sales Tax? <br /> The real issue is that if we want to have a viable transit system in Everett <br /> we must pass <br /> e and work hard to gain voter approval <br /> thUnless is change laws this s the only alternative which will sallow <br /> the serviceto survive. ,IIS <br /> Why not place this issue on the ballot with <br /> the <br /> proposed <br /> ed bond i <br /> ssues? <br /> This a y possible,but it drawbacksad additional <br /> peole asabond issue <br /> This issue isatax <br /> �one vtIt benefits many <br /> tyes,i expensive for another.bond issue asks for <br /> improvements,this issue is asking for <br /> the possible survival of a service. <br /> What is theeffect <br /> attached aav a ld <br /> The calculatare based on information from the <br /> ithe Snohomish ons <br /> Economic Development <br /> Council <br /> March,1978. Te £ <br /> average <br /> h ld of P ,.earning <br /> 818,60 will 2a0 4.84 p in <br /> r 237ea than t t 1.0 year household t <br /> earning thanapproximately$15,000 will paying lesshan y presently as <br /> Households <br /> These are answers to questions I have been hearing <br /> $ explain this m voting important issue we will be v nd next weekll better }, <br /> aevideat dds Councilman it was <br /> What d in California that ap n ople relte againsi y }' <br /> taxe <br /> Councilman Michelson also spoke against the tax Increase and <br /> np fthatservice h r oh elami than a <br /> dd anyadditional <br /> Ross Hogland of Box reminded the council thattransit pays for isbeen on the committee endorsigt epurchaseo <br /> He did transit inwas very much in favor of the tax. <br /> test,however,thatperhaps <br /> the <br /> and <br /> at could be done in 1979 instead of, Buz Winecoff of 1229 Madronna also spoke in favor <br /> He felt s tax correct y to go. o£the transa system. <br /> „ Fat McClain of the Chamber <br /> of Commerce said in h n a sampling of the retail <br /> core y w <br /> e i t e o increase. i; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.