Laserfiche WebLink
293 <br /> July,2,1978 <br /> • <br /> authorizing and <br /> State resolution <br /> C Depof Everement7 Ecology f Ordinance eae adopted totheWashingtoo <br /> en <br /> review a7 approval. <br /> wherethat as,Washington Administrative Code' 178-60110(1)acknowledges of nabatement and control i -12rily the reapnsi- <br /> bilfty f localgovernment; dWhereas,WAC <br /> 178-60-110(2)authorizes the Director of the ashi <br /> ngton State <br /> orreEcology to approve 1ordinances which impose noise <br /> -trlrquixemenisdfferent from these adopted by the department, nd <br /> whereas,the City f Evers developed a proposed Noise Control Ordi- <br /> nance(has conducted a rev iheorinance,has held <br /> apublic meetinafter g notic,,ono dot..taoEcology.tevere Noise <br /> Control approval by the Departmentd • <br /> N ,therefore,be it resole y the Everett city Council a follows: <br /> .The Mayor i authorized anb <br /> dd directed to2728=1 Attachment,. this <br /> Resolution N 1498,entied"Everett Ordinance,"to the <br /> Washington State Departmentogy forat <br /> Ecology al;a s review,comment an ap-. <br /> 2. The Everett C' Councild <br /> adopted the attache " Noise <br /> Cent Ordinance,"toge earwith changes deemed appropriate <br /> Everett ythe O <br /> Cool <br /> Council, <br /> Ordsubjectnance t ith eCDepa tmentxofes logy's review,astheNoiseCon- <br /> et <br /> t. <br /> 21'0=sCoeekdwhoth ten <br /> d o ocdlCo7alman P e,1cInas excuse d.n Aldcroft <br /> Motion Carried• <br /> RESOLUTION(09787-281) <br /> Grant Weed. f.the attorney's office reviewed the differences between the <br /> Everett 08778 <br /> 0 <br /> regulations..e control Ordinance elawa DOE <br /> n1 kho t to NoiseControl <br /> be o8 and <br /> with the dvnance•an order to omplywithv <br /> the regulations. <br /> t ,1....i <br /> Reaolutlon0N7�v 14976117691670 <br /> ws(a 077 17 071716827 072"t"" <br /> 07 d06 <br /> 6 <br /> A resolution documenting the finding o£the M the E vt_ <br /> cil t special conditions within the City avor and necessitate <br /> City <br /> differences tb ween the E rolrdinanc and nthe aWashington <br /> State Noise Control Act of1974ands theadministrative877eregulations pro <br /> ed by the Washington State Department of Ecology pursuant to the • 'f <br /> 1974.1. <br /> Whereas,on 1974 thed the <br /> adversely W Legislature, <br /> inding t nadequately controlled noise ta fee health, • <br /> safety,andtwelfere f and diminishesthevalueofrte • <br /> and the quality t meted the Washingtonf' <br /> adminContristrative Act of 1974,authorizing atheto <br /> az t ofEcologytoaprom ate <br /> regulations oethe A and requiring the - <br /> M..oioncoloa to an approve local ordinancescontrolling0noise <br /> PollWhereas,onaJa 1975,th Department of Ecology promulgated the <br /> Motor Vehicle NoiaePerformance e 8828ds,.Chapter 173-60 of the Wash- <br /> ington Administrative N.),and o April 22,1975,the Department <br /> promulgated the"MaximumdEnvironmental Novae Levels,.WAC Chapter 173-60; <br /> and <br />