Laserfiche WebLink
129" <br /> August 9,1978 <br /> moved by Councilman Aldcroft,seconded by Councilman Pope Cue close <br /> the public hearing. <br /> Roll <br /> was was <br /> excused with all Councilmen vo g yes except Councilman Baker <br /> who • Motion Carried <br /> COUNCIL BILL 787-296 <br /> Final Reading. <br /> Paling <br /> ane amensg Ordinance 587-76,amending flood plain regulatlens <br /> o:alnapne]nz. <br /> Moved by Councilman Michelson,seconded by Councilmen Aldcroft that t <br /> his1 o a a final <br /> regf cilBill 787-296 a the CtyClerk i ecte to caithrofothe disposition of theordinance. <br /> is <br /> Roll 1 Ayes: Michelson,Gipson,Avderoft,Pope Overstreet <br /> Excused:Baker <br /> Ordinance No.537-7e adopted. <br /> ON-STREET ING PERMIT(Cl 788-116) • <br /> DonnaP dL A <br /> neighborhood parking d i d p POsed r 0 ry.�{- <br /> Y1! <br /> the hi provide 1 hourRockefeller,Oad Lombardf Pacific 4th Street b would exempt <br /> ihy special oesaLarking permoftro.thePo t won abe ret residents the area only so <br /> the h could ax* the streets in front their homes a asked y(oncil to approve the resolution, <br /> on Council Aldcroft seid in discussing this repo do with the <br /> City Attorney bre opinion w that a ordinance a to be pre- <br /> pared <br /> er than this <br /> The Lithbe written a to implement have ening permit.nexeek <br /> being es old have ding ..� <br /> Councilman h 1 osuggested that this permit be i the residents 1`e°' <br /> as far res- <br /> idents inath this area would causesuse sutLwg omits to a xt `� <br /> older kers Doth into the re <br /> i hbonc�oa.as <br /> ne « , <br /> Bapaaametrioushagreed with thin <br /> and said they did n want inflict <br /> problems o ear neighbors and ifo <br /> the Council wished t othisthey •.{ <br /> would be very happy to incorporate at in their request. <br /> Moved by Councilman Avd ot,seconded by Councilman Pope to delete <br /> the prroposeresolutionfrom the ba Clzcomingei -F <br /> Rollwaas called excused,with all councilmen voting yes except Councilman Raker <br /> who wamotion carried <br />