Laserfiche WebLink
355 <br /> August 30,1978 <br /> LEGAL-CONTRACTUAL <br /> needs 6of the C INFORMATION:vtan ustnldiaEverett te tnees eddhe 0o uiure water <br /> The agreement ach P cogniresethat i otheir advantage <br /> teat hat facilities River Basin t developed by <br /> . <br /> electric purposes of ntfortion h of multipurpose aPro'act of heCro- ! <br /> Project <br /> 1 <br /> esidenisplfPnolPimsesnish ount fethesCvdTeoatd °LmtY,a_ <br /> Th acded byte esootnkeus ^a�fic provision-fcan or la—tel • <br /> t on water service <br /> being <br /> bee pt provided at"reasonableer municipalities <br /> parties s nrred definedtwnai_theyservice <br /> d discitsconsequencesfore at Article Snohomish <br /> and the PUD <br /> hats sot <br /> from Mx.seed i he June 29,Everett,1978 r ma Hulbert,tLe POD <br /> Attachment Parker Williams,PUDCounsel. (A copy ofthat memorandum is <br /> Manager <br /> The actual Ag me PublicUtility District No. <br /> o£Snohomish County <br /> hand the City for Multipurpose tlof theSultanRiver"is a 37 <br /> e document with <br /> to <br /> eseveral'attachments which is Slableyou through Evrette y recordsi you wish o review r <br /> t. <br /> The City o£s from believes thati the legal right <br /> to gtanobtain w vCe they f a he"reasonable rates"crabs in the Ever <br /> des <br /> UD contract of 1980. <br /> In <br /> 'COST OF 9 y rets metanet the conta — —i a the cost <br /> service and e';; <br /> wat <br /> te <br /> ser <br /> wate <br /> system as of the <br /> �erra structure h t m. That firm' eporiuforththfindings which eloped asresultofaeta=, h Y establishes u vice"figures for theMl• £.the s.and takes into consideration as of the"cost"the nea "maup"o or - .,al a 1 that i requiredmaintain improve r .f,epital Tha study shows that several ma municipal <br /> a P naaing•w from Eare a nme mn coat. <br /> te er customers Sine the of b toe <br /> .}vmcrrn water <br /> service contracts <br /> A. <br /> ty <br /> snby Contract <br /> Coa1 0 h. 1 oishreluctanth ense with the1vrAt on i.. negotiations 0misexplored atgreeinhar"t ^anthe shorttm,b doEEveeisarenegotiate' belowc cstwhen <br /> most sr ,tre cost figure,but m understanding ithathat offerwarejected <br /> is not 5 recognized in 82 OFFER <br /> is <br /> saoTommahPt from the cony letter, by b consursuant ider <br /> ed an offer b they <br /> of Y r1960 betty N y p r l l f the <br /> Agreement <br /> City of h f Everett d h 1 f <br /> City o fame the Cit cof Ever to rate-of$9 p on galEverett <br /> supply <br /> Cala r Snohomish further offers i with the City o er tTthat <br /> on <br /> increases increased o o contract <br /> basis win the v s <br /> and a to be oc servced incurred by theCity Of Everett.as The c I <br /> describeds the above-referencedin mcontract,costincreases <br /> VII,e Sectiould on those <br /> Per by the <br /> adust an.Yoholm aapproach n a in 1975 cost..drat.study done <br /> negotiate mPane.sWithhhintthe guidelines described a we <br /> wouldoffer_ o incorporate that °t` .:5. <br /> by erne cite a We would in o f the i s§presently <br /> Lorne <br /> t s than i present cost oft of aservice..ny or all oWelbelievts erthat <br /> t <br /> :C <br />