Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> 410 October 11,1978 <br /> Moved by Councilman.Ogeistreet,a corded by.Councilman P <br /> the ordinance <br /> h <br /> that t appeal procedure be changed so that the appeal <br /> would be made the Board Adjustment. <br /> Role w called with Councilmen tin n Over- <br /> street and Pope who hvoted Cyescand councilman Michelson was excused. <br /> Motion Lost <br /> Moved by Councilman Pope,seconded b Councilman Lang,that this is <br /> declared to be a final r ing of Council ill788-344 and City <br /> Clerk is directed to call the roll for the final disposition of the <br /> ordinance as presented an final draft form. <br /> Roll call. Ayes:L ip AldeeeL,Pope,Overstreet <br /> bays( <br /> (Meseograw 1q son excused <br /> Ordinance#555-78 adopted <br /> COUNCIL BILL 789-383 <br /> Final Reading <br /> Yt i <br /> fctnytag as iRodenwHoa dnor Btg1p <br /> � <br /> Cloys Henning again presented different <br /> draft of the ordinanceto the <br /> Council again it was exactly the same ordinance in just a dif- <br /> ferent manner. <br /> • <br /> He the area adjacent t Casino Road as zoned 1 family <br /> p high density.rHe showed slidesofroad shoeing that <br /> multiple <br /> Rome <br /> present is i '10 feet a side of the mi with 4 foot <br /> and drainage ditch adjacent to i <br /> the ordinance including t definitions of the• development requirement including immediate i ement,interim the <br /> prevements and the ultimate improvements. <br /> 1 ovemeitea the contributions d.anne requiredd 1 n ment to erin <br /> He explained <br /> t Casino el:and th4 o pe <br /> authorized i aiidnth y d b working attorney <br /> very closely nw h the developersin the area. <br /> uncilman Overstreet asked ifthere w inflation factor in the <br /> • ordinance f someone developing property an <br /> and:Mr.Ben- <br /> ning said this ordinance only pertained to two years. <br /> • <br /> • alk ordinsnceR Loof the Snohomish County Master Buildeopposed <br /> the rec r rs <br /> 1Councilman <br /> oby Sin Langus spoke <br /> development <br /> in the aas felt this was <br /> infringing on he citizens nllivingththere for some time and <br /> should n have o pay for large devel p e causing a problem on <br /> i, the street. <br /> • <br /> Councilman Baker said the builders have had t e these-improvements <br /> within thesubdivision but they had required to imrovte <br /> adjacent s eats and shethis was. te9£onward, <br /> Moved the Councilman Overstreet, Councilman P that 8 <br /> amended by insertng(c)O n 81 theCitycouncil <br /> may adjust these charges to meet increasedconstructioncosts. <br />