Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> actober 11,1978 413 <br />• Ed x con ttorney£o tae Snoaomish C aiartmentnopseo I� <br /> launits per member. <br /> embha 400 embers awning 500 unit-a-vlecnwaveiaged <br /> Hilfelt.this ordinance does n vinot.reduce rents. Only one le a rental u and it <br /> • <br /> m,the conversion <br /> dnterdnaeiosuan h and oeviction <br /> note this problem but instead problems for many apart- <br /> ment <br /> gdalso takes a ® fooPle a tight live in an adult o te,r <br /> recommendeds. <br /> He they Council amend the zoning ca establishing <br /> zone fametalaceety' The apartment house owners also <br /> sthat a task meof apartment house owners,tenants <br /> onion builders,-etc.beorgsed t discuss thprobemand <br /> come up with,solution. <br /> sugge <br /> • <br /> Richard Platt and Charles Brown then spoke against the ordinance, <br /> Prez and <br /> Anderson ee objectedat Atha a apaon rtment <br /> spoke in f of the <br /> a with <br /> the.proposed ordinance andthetenants unionpeople did not receive it. <br /> JudyReid <br /> ken d favor f the ordina suggested t should <br /> She also felt the problem lay wte in the ith theinancem lata owners <br /> be reviewed. <br /> ba largeland spa from use <br /> highanada,etc., <br /> who er <br /> come emen the City,lea construct wt a large apartment lathe complex, <br /> manager d then leave�iown.without worrying tui tenants. <br /> • <br /> Pam Hiltonspoke in favor of the ordinance saying t d be a <br /> throoghso solution t the problem until a permanent solutionwasfound <br /> and formlthe.task force recomoendedan panducomingdbackewith9atbetthis errdordi- <br /> e.Councoming bat ordi- <br /> nance. <br /> Baker said she would like to see this ordinance changed s <br /> they could no n <br /> cause evict a tenant on because of children without good <br /> creating a long period lof tide before eviction when a complex <br /> re being converted to adult only, <br /> Counci <br /> asked tlmat thlecroft Mayora o urged the Council gtto et reject the ordinance and ' <br /> rn thirty days t tryandworkdent out Gipsonsolution. <br /> g a s Force with <br /> Roll wasnthe t <br /> icalled o motion r with counce <br /> angos,aldcronot,P panga <br /> o Baker g il.en B and <br /> Gipson voting and Coun fSEanMichelson aroused. a <br /> Motion carried {I <br /> Celan d ne would <br /> garner loeG'ksat Menp oblem, eek that a task force be pot t- <br /> • <br /> ilman Baker said she would bring anext <br /> ee <br /> which Cealtatrictly'with discrimination against those tenthoose whoevicted families with children without cause. <br /> • <br />