Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 444 <br /> November 1,1978 <br /> Councilman Pope ked what impact this would have on)th Avenue and <br /> in tGregoire <br /> is area replied <br /> not impacthat t theftraffic to any great extent.ic Department Nelt the nuMber of lots <br /> Councilman Pape felt that this developer should be responsible in some • <br /> manner to improve 7th Avenue if the bond issue did not go through and <br /> Lloyd of atto ,City rney lopersto9participate ested the iin an LIDty couldsforeimproving <br /> 7thAvenue if the bond issue fade <br /> Councilman Michelson x park purposes a e <br /> askedexplained-eh.plat was large e <br /> expected i hs <br /> developers0reati.11 are.and <br /> other veloped property w - <br /> the nh <br /> eew d be charged aion area could <br /> be provided that all the developmentsouldlutilize.. <br /> Councilman Alderoft asked if this was legal and Brad Cattle,CitY Attorneg, <br /> said this was covered under the RCW. <br /> Curt Petterson of 709 105th Place <br /> feetPaving, sidewalk against <br /> the <br /> plat but he wthat condition 4 hf Upon <br /> questioning <br /> Gregoire replied•t 4bere the coun- <br /> cil <br /> ile stated that Bo d between <br /> dthe plat was <br /> partially(e c bs)w siewalko <br /> ) <br /> side. <br /> However,during the bing should <br /> be werked out with the Engita <br /> neering Department a a motion had been made edeveloper that at • <br /> least a walk <br /> be installed. This was not in the packet. <br /> Mr.Petterson ysaid this was what he was objecting to. He had been <br /> par of <br /> ore <br /> the Planning <br /> meeting las <br /> when Commission times <br /> t they lefth <br /> t fel, of t problems had been ed but • <br /> now this new one came upagain. • <br /> • <br />• engineer <br /> 105th s etvfromatheirsaid <br /> plat to <br /> l;" ut curbs and sidewalks on <br /> ardsoo hadditional fill d..cause drainage p required <br /> suggestedhad been theyputusidewalk on the s ofH105thaStreet <br /> butdidn't awould making be <br /> tthink hat w sfnfair his developer to bav do that.improvement to someone else's and he <br /> Councilman Aldcroft felt that inasmuch as e packet in front of the coun- • <br /> ng the <br /> Planning hd one thing and earing,cno tion and there had been other discussion ia <br /> • meeting mshould be held with the Planning Commission g some of these <br />• problems <br /> Moved by Councilman Alderoft,seconded by Councilman Pope to close the <br /> public hearing. • <br /> President Michelson asked if anyone else wished to speak on this proposed <br /> lat and no one rePlied. <br /> pRoll was called with all councilmen voting yes except Councilman Gipson <br /> who was excused. <br /> Moved by Councilman Aldcroft,seconded by Councilman Overstreet <br /> this matter for two weeks and request a with t Planning C - <br /> mission,the plcant,the r g Department,a discuss <br /> these problems. <br /> Councilman <br /> street fosted that ndition number 12 be added concern- <br /> o h Avenue if the bond issue <br /> failed.power ofattorney rdevelopment <br /> led <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes except Councilman Gipson <br /> who was excused. <br /> Motion carried <br />