Laserfiche WebLink
492 <br /> November 29,1978 <br /> All of 2 Avenue lying between Block <br /> ell Divisio nt recordedinVolume .'. <br /> 5f of Plats,page 9,records f Snohomish ,Washington. <br /> Less that portionabuttingLots 1 and 2 of said Block 8,Lowell <br /> have <br /> oned for vacation of <br /> W .C.te for 9.010 pr hearing right-of-way; <br /> Whereas,ion.fis P.C.W. rtaun, <br /> that the City Council shall by esolu- <br /> therefore,be it resolved ity of Eve <br /> that a ublicey <br /> set he CitY Cour.. o <br /> December City <br /> Council s(Public Hearing Room), <br /> shrhmy Administration <br /> Building, the proposed apor of aforesaid <br /> right-of-way as herein described. <br /> resolvedBe it further t tree be given as require y law as set <br /> forth in P.C.W.35.79.020. <br /> lea w all councilmen votingr except councilmen Overstreet <br /> Roll <br /> Gipscalled <br /> were excused. <br /> • otron carried <br /> COUNCIL BILL 7e11-430 <br /> Dennis erickson o asked t Council delay <br /> easing o revising 5th <br /> and final <br /> ergreen w requested <br /> hoe athis at nivne rea. meet ecause Ofthe. the citizens <br /> councilman xlderoft suggested that before making a <br /> decision on a project <br /> like this some discussion on thegrow policy n the itys should be held. <br /> President <br /> Baker a ked thebacklog of zones, <br /> they were 9Derickson <br /> replied there a just 1 <br /> that were <br /> coming Council shortly and he requestedthese <br /> taken care of as soon as possible. For instance <br /> the <br /> zone <br /> change before <br /> eightomonths. <br /> the uncil on 75th and Evergreen way had been the process for about <br />• <br /> President Baker agreed <br /> and s owing t recommendation of the <br /> CommissionPlanning <br /> disccussing i <br /> Theleast <br /> a on 75th multiple family <br /> ato better <br /> partment <br /> houses built shorrg center. which could cause more problem p s bly than <br /> the <br /> Councilman[. tap growth <br /> the City of Everett as he felt he would rather they <br /> the city as it is <br /> right now. <br /> Brad Cattle,City Attorney,told the Council that based on <br /> could d they could <br /> not say consideration, ble <br /> s.do not the ncityudur g the interim <br /> period that t growth tprogram is discussed. <br /> Moved by Councilman Michelson,seconded by Councilman Aldcroft that the <br /> final reading of this proposed ordinance be continued until December 20th <br /> nightat a <br /> Roll was called with all councilYon 9 voting yes except Councilmen Over- <br /> street and Gipson who were excussd. Motion Carried • <br />