My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1978/12/06 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1978/12/06 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:52:27 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:23:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
12/6/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 6,1978 497 <br />• <br /> The regular <br /> o order at 1 <br /> 8:00 a ting o 19978e=ate Hrett earing Room ofthe <br /> Coas uncil <br /> County Ce <br /> • <br /> with President <br /> alled t <br /> CouncilmanOverstreet who was excused,ing and all • <br /> councilmeninCatte dance except <br /> • <br /> • ILL-RING BRIDGE ALTERNATIves(CH7812-462) • <br /> Vince Rhinehart of the Engineering Department <br /> repo <br /> progress of the <br /> design for the Widening of the , <br /> all-Ringeb Mukilte engineering between <br /> od <br /> Drive. On April d26thntM1 Mayor andCouncilapproved the cagreementn� <br /> which <br /> orized <br /> e consultant,Tippets, <br /> (TAMS) ompleteht dPhase I f the widen McCarthy and n -� <br /> Merrill-Ring ti reliminaryoengineering rthe <br /> • otta�e has n atema part engineering <br /> mi proposal <br /> far adoptionawbridge g gsdesign p alternative <br /> This design 0 44 tf <br /> pnov ridgewidening for bridge <br /> adjacent t m oath sid tot the 1 <br /> constructing <br /> parallel <br /> dlcost ridgeeisn$802,400e <br /> July 1978 inflation costs. using <br /> He then reviewed alternative d2 which <br /> luded e w look • <br /> alike steel trusses similar to the existing,one on each side of the <br />. existing structure,extending the existing <br /> constructing <br /> foot wide concr6te deck <br /> fsidewalk north. <br /> Projected cost of 19y= would be 01,081,5005 f1079T <br /> alternatives <br /> satisfy the <br /> H requirements although the second an <br />• <br /> e is <br /> abovet ebudgetedcos. <br /> Alternative 113 called for a new 30 foot concrete` <br /> sidewalk on the cot • <br /> curb to curb 704.0 hwidth rrequiremento UAB. estimated cast of • <br /> this is 0734,000..wa • <br /> Alternative X4 would be a do-nothing alternative. <br /> decided <br /> �mi- <br />• <br />• ke• of <br /> and the <br /> reimburse the for expenses incurred i11 <br /> t ai a= pproximatir$47,000. i) <br /> Rhiiehasaidthe b immediate danger b t v - <br /> ' <br /> far <br /> ertstandards <br /> than <br /> the <br /> sayThere are ) <br /> • foot lanes and the n today is teach lane. <br /> There haccidents in 9y Federal law stthat 18 II <br /> or ss highway sclassified as a one- roadwayand,h bridge as 1 <br /> 19 feet wide. 1 <br /> Councilman 900.so east disruptive <br /> to traffic,etc.and nnehart replied alternative <br /> alternative <br /> evident Gipson a s lo- <br /> Minehartoreplied tabout 115efeet of right-ofbwayrin addition <br /> t tine structure. • <br /> Don Chase,a resident at 1827 Mukilteo Boulevard,suggested there <br /> need for this <br /> roadwaythrough sethere <br /> J Gulchwhichwould c itht g <br /> free• way <br /> • <br /> eliminating along a proposal � <br /> recommended alternative dlde <br /> higaytsuggestedt d south I <br /> side of the bridge <br /> be lowered and the bnarrowed which possibly <br /> eliminates oftheaetfelti pI <br /> would jt increase t speedo boulevard. He-said if a bridge I <br /> had to be he felt <br /> alternative 142 <br /> realized thebridge w arrow but he <br /> thought a 44 foot wide bridge <br /> was completely unnecessary. <br /> L ]l. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.