Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> 501 <br /> December 6,1978 <br /> Brad Cattle,City Attorney, <br /> the Council that rior to making <br /> ing this <br /> findings as to thedreasons forgtheirddeniial or approvalthe Cncil must . forth their • <br /> Gar randste er ng the petitioner for the i • <br /> d the <br /> ezone had <br /> had reer side <br /> see d theonent on this n zzonnem representing <br /> sn The deveveloping elopment <br /> he UPPpetitieners <br /> ticn <br /> strictb.a a ur 1 tot present quest andhA-1.at• was split from <br /> one owshowed s1id4„co ctly below and d hill f <br /> cause y the drainage from a upper area a ovon e hizz. ems to h op y <br /> Mr.Brandstetter then showed a video tape <br /> ea <br /> he steep <br /> caxlaoincludingYslope eddnhe siltation coming improperaYn the recentlyvnvolvia suit regarding draina ••ge. <br /> He proposalen pwasentedcons theCity <br /> dClerk with compatible with which h showed comprehensive planheir <br /> City of Everett,sthng <br /> ordinance,the eent xaloprincs therezone <br /> nagn tent with other ordinances <br /> such as subdivision,specialproperty duse,etc. <br /> He also <br /> sented <br /> the rezoneerequesttbby ciaa Clerk with <br /> majority ofpetition-which <br /> thet w= hhe ens He supportedaihos <br /> in favor the r had assessed ft53227,,8iotbitt <br /> those opposed w rezone <br /> amountsof$116,,380,inHe alsm <br /> of the opponents do not live inthe area. He also stated <br /> the John Hatch,representing nithe area, <br /> iithe citzoned rea _1 because it is the bpossible a timeee problez.of <br /> water fti thea would increase <br /> and <br /> had proposed some drainage ease- <br /> ments to the City <br /> stem <br /> that to the[ er drainage ease- <br /> meats stop at the atith sipoint.WaHedfef ers would taaliropere plans show e a wed rJ <br /> ow the racrossin an R-1 zone the oed d drainage and naintort - 1 <br /> frppr problems. the <br /> thestate <br /> pro sedrezone area nd also will causepossible a great n[ <br /> lia ility o the city.He said Po <br /> 311 acres of the 44G acre rezonerequestby <br /> against the said i had been R-1 sine 1 heit <br /> nn <br /> ed 1 <br /> into <br /> he city and <br /> zsrezone. <br /> int on to the Commission felt there ybea problem and was Council. w <br /> Jr.. emrequested area w <br /> ul <br /> Presented <br /> e City Clerk with Pesigned people - <br /> to the rezone and alsoreport which he said <br /> problems could be minimized fora development by proper engineeringp <br /> He said the <br /> interest in this <br /> rea comes from parties out of th <br /> rezone area,Pand etooafreeze it in an x-1 zone now would make it unuseablee ! <br /> 1. <br /> /n answer to a question by Council,bir.Hatch said to any change. his causer w opposed <br /> - feasible <br /> s he properction to u such a <br /> that it would not be feasi a to developrthe property.c <br /> adopted this <br /> s croftpropos a ned eat difference if the Council <br /> against if they I <br /> becat as it is now and Mr.Hatch answered that it <br /> use it wouldsimply bop y prospects from developing for A-1 for an interim bthe area. al <br /> i <br /> 1 <br /> i <br />