Laserfiche WebLink
December 20.19743 <br /> of Reininga Corporation of 5 Francisco,California <br /> p.- <br /> erty be rezoned <br /> from a3 M B-2 Community <br /> Business. They <br /> are spark. Phase I <br /> acresincludes ten loped w 35,000 square <br /> rde ,20,0 supermarket, <br /> hp space and one <br /> Constructionor two restaurants and banks. i 1979. <br /> nibdential development, <br /> would <br /> geo andsmarket demand.deHe density <br /> city would review plana <br /> for Phase II at a later date. <br /> The planning Commission had held two public hearings and an EIS is com- <br /> pleted. In relation to the comprehensive plan thepresently multi- <br /> family. studies(Halprin and a Way)s consolidated Recent s s Evergreen oinerk-can <br /> development. The comprehensive plan is recommended thbe"changed to"lihsi- <br /> nes s-light commercial. <br /> The developer had agreed to deed additional sight-of-way to provide two way • <br /> left-turn lane,and a curb'right 1 ,gutters d sidewalk on 75th • <br /> They will ealhgn the 75thee dnal an < walkway <br /> from e project east to <br /> Beverly eo They will <br /> nal a the Evergreene approximately 300 feedtraffic <br /> s of- Street <br /> should it be needed. There will be a curb lane along Evergreen way from <br /> the.entrance to.25th Street. • <br /> . - <br /> At the 77th street <br /> the street <br /> off o Way <br /> o the project they will dedicate160feetuof right-of-way a the south <br /> proper line and provide access <br /> properly said,ofc theyEvergreen <br /> o wwe <br /> have ply noise <br /> ordinance,the glare,lighting,provide landscape buffer <br /> along the e. The final plans would be reviewedPlanning <br /> Departmen, <br /> • <br /> memo had been prepared by the planning and engineering departments listing <br /> four additional conditions,one <br /> of which would b the developer would <br /> dead a 60 foot right-of-way a the south end of their for <br /> At the utheast corner Ne city would then plan on ntinuing this sstreet <br /> ov.to Casino Road. <br /> • <br /> He said <br /> the <br /> Planning Con® had reco)mnended <br /> thcompre - <br />• use planbe changed as mentioned and also concurredinthe request far re- <br /> Councilman a Casino would be there if • <br /> the shopping ac kdidrn the <br /> indand nM Gregoire said this w - <br /> tsed route form cross street from Evergreen Way o Casino as shown on <br /> he bond issue. <br /> Councilman Michelson objected t 1 light a approxi- <br /> mately 76th S e proposedbecauseshould.).a right. <br /> turn lane only going,into that shopping acenter and out.ere <br /> fhi <br /> Alan roodhouse,representing the devsloyer,said the residents the area <br /> e generally agreeable ntonthe shopping c ,but�they are <br /> concerned about trafficnoise and lights. <br /> company planned <br /> on taking every precaution to make s that the.noise,awould be kePt <br /> at minimum so o bother the hem,.• <br /> were going to goathrough with PhaseII as soon as the <br /> interest in the shopping center. H also pointed possible othe ec council <br /> ted c corporationfortraffic signals,etc. 3 <br /> requested bysthe ocity would be approximately[$300,0000.t <br /> BakerCouncilman <br /> fells a light <br /> south 75th s de <br /> installed. Georgenlelianof 1100 Cascade Drive he was not against t. <br /> the shopping c r but he felt people would-not 1.18e Evergreen W t - <br /> ter the center but r:�yBcule <br /> yard,Ra rive,�75tc <br /> 75th Street,e down the back streets c <br /> reet, taus problems for the residents <br /> in that area. <br />