Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> _ . _ <br /> • <br /> 4 <br /> 4 January 24,1979 <br /> • <br /> Ile then introduced the members of the Planning C mm=ssion in attendance. <br /> 'ao_A 6mE_ <br /> iaiest.draft <br /> Reid 5�e Development r <br /> ihef t the Council previous+� <br /> ot2 City edefinitions, <br /> point- <br /> ing <br /> growt <br /> 4 is occurring and <br /> will <br /> continue" <br /> aaa <br /> tArowth mprocess t all he effect. <br /> control:ofa of complex <br /> elements <br /> f the <br /> crmmd <br /> •= = the = engrowth wile avoid- <br /> ing <br /> - <br /> g(asbe the pi-trans.'. <br /> ot6"o growth i <br /> Philoso- <br /> phy which c�nf <br /> ommmunity' iabilittoesponsiblyrnnage .. <br /> IT rarely, ever,achieves its intent inability <br /> ed as an approach <br /> by this Council." <br /> He then went e saying x importabnYraaichsta =h <br /> ted the 1' tothescopedinfluence, w <br /> othery d theis procedural ire ssues Council a <br /> ethtn <br /> odmto the formaprogress he sofa le trt <br /> bthendecision P th check <br /> e <br /> issue works its to briefedgrowth matters and <br /> Anothernts item <br /> w dery the Pwe can e issues <br /> statedeCouncil must on an develop <br /> wa=le <br /> respect which prows s meeting act. 1 <br /> respecting whictheallows us to <br /> 1 ba <br /> Conctddid <br /> uflseem to ag a onnt2e ollrwdin9aprinc=mleand said that th e <br /> a. Government's role is o tes liabiect litiess. n any <br /> streets,b. Unrestrained growth new students,etc. to betexpected i <br /> c. Nei houses,new <br /> d Acomm mustw these <br /> e. extent these additions ce accomodatea, he community <br /> is et accept <br /> f. extthe <br /> additionscannot be accomodated- .,wer <br /> , <br /> acceptancehowever hard we try, of new elements m slip <br /> backward <br /> quality community-government sthe rig and obliga- <br /> tion <br /> n pose requirements eaaen o they <br /> g "new- <br /> comer"reachnd can <br /> offer opportunitiescto a current t to=mP <br /> ghborhoodafacilities :streets,sewers,uest.)£w is unreal- <br /> istic: <br /> - <br /> rt. approve <br /> obligatedtoimPthbe- <br /> cause <br /> existing residents refuse o assume a fa=r shares of <br /> improvements.I.said lso in the procedural follows:e <br /> The Council issues#16 seemed to be very important <br /> to the Council. This was the <br /> ofha9reviewPsacrifi_ cad. We exect,however,the eft etfe quantity. <br /> ent <br /> review to.-prop rtionald elaysto its complexity or impact on the community. <br /> Ile said in conclusion the Council had stated"we few <br /> re at a <br /> deemat be bona Y prior decisionsh e no <br /> longer <br /> beginning <br /> p ate. <br />