Laserfiche WebLink
W <br /> 116 March 14..1974. <br /> @ ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE(,8793-113) <br /> t Jimtrunk of the Risk Office reported,the £ thpsent <br /> me provides coverageDr..-de ense_c is judgmentsitselected <br /> and appointed officialsand employees for their ra and omissions in <br /> n4h <br />'... <br /> performance of t official lddutiesawithv their scope <br /> unt n this funds <br /> Pits umulative r insurance£uAt ses es not <br /> excess[ss i <br /> s raapproximatelyrtheselfi0sur f The rand omissions age. <br /> Thus the city nwould ce eadd' erresponsible <br /> realm G hLelated to <br /> againstex- <br /> ceeds <br /> thea(ty ,donee Eits <br /> and awards resultingfrom or employees f he citytwhich <br /> ceedslthe leveleftheu slrc elf insurance. <br /> President Aldcraft left the meeting at this time. <br /> rank amended that n errors and omissions insurance be Purchased <br /> a[ his time,co <br /> councilman Langus returned e meeting. <br /> 0misdby Councilman P e,daecandestbf Co ntmlman Gipson that no erVe[etreet <br /> l4 i e a insurance 05P lurchaaed hien[ x <br /> k41 0ll o o en w nun civ nd a excu n o <br /> I who v[edea a d c ,limen Aldcxoftva aaeaker whoewt a <br />."tt Mn Carried <br /> SII II PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION AND MORATORIUM(03793-108.109.110,111) <br /> Brad Cattle,City Attorney,felt the question uppermost in the councilmen's <br /> mind was the.legality 0f prohibiting <br /> c versions from apartments to lc0 do <br /> miniums. He said this was legal an an <br /> be done fairly easily.luItowas <br /> a litcondominiums. <br /> le more difficult t ordinance placing r <br /> aid there should be a tion designating a g to <br /> Iji <br /> be held too ba athe moratorium such assn therev h inteof rest i <br /> in the area,etc.up r if it a found that itisinst a bestflin uofnthe <br /> health,safety and�wel.fareaof the citizens. <br /> Roberta Goodenough of the Planning Departmentum reviewedthe The first ordnance <br /> nces <br /> before the regarding can ng residential ental units[e c0- <br /> ovldindividualc nver120 days of.hie orherintention <br /> tom sell; m .A)navetenants refusal on purchae o <br /> a thea 11 () s 60daysright of fuse"(2005505 to pay rent, <br /> the ai unit, 1. give <br /> [tenantsons 0r a odrte cause" creating nuisance) <br /> during <br /> i. comply with the perteriod, <br /> f the tenancy r it in reloca- <br /> tion <br /> during t f they elect <br /> ect not ID)urch e $350 per <br /> thenbuildinglo <br /> hs.120 t tenants(E)bring <br /> a a into <br /> and with <br /> tthe beew housing <br /> by the 050200Pe units()mayffered for <br /> n increase <br /> rent for anyatenants during the 120 day notice period. <br /> 1'.... She said the second00 ordinance000200 050 des[he same stipulations with <br /> the ex- <br /> does not <br /> captions t t does n the6350 relocation assistance <br /> quire theownert0 bring <br /> b the 0000ing in mpliance wi 010500hs <br /> ctlde These ere the iqg®.t differences between the ordinances. <br />