Laserfiche WebLink
110 <br /> March 14,19/9 <br />• <br /> 201 STUDY(CB793-112) <br /> sin <br /> f Repzesenlatives ofing S udy,too firm that <br /> 1reviewed the Rtheackground YS010 a <br /> They Marysville, <br /> Muilteo,Snohomish <br /> had been t he hei°st <br /> They said it encompassed Everett,Fircrest Sewer,Lake Stevens and Lake , <br /> Tribe in the region. explainedatment was feasiblewe f <br /> i'" ouldsc ri system. n there <br /> `there would be a ` aEverett <br /> with Scott <br /> Company <br /> but th s had to be droppedalso f from E ent erettss <br /> m. The Everett <br /> Fregion itself encompasses o e otrSmith an <br /> we,hthawouaeDvcleoWateristrict, astmont d <br /> an area that drain to the Me <br /> of <br /> he river <br /> a.3 <br /> Problems were listed such rainfall runoff,the condition <br /> treatment discharging,pump station z future g <br /> plant discharge violations violations he capacityforth. <br /> d in <br /> S 1They t reviewed s projects <br /> rivet n9 rehabisary to be litation, <br /> treatment <br /> planinclt <br /> imps interceptors, <br /> the problemofstreet and s <br />{V floodingt plant'm laments f the <br /> 6 Councilman Overstreet a ked if t t be them wasin a priority <br />},.�� typee orders and dthe answer given w felt the <br /> ouncilprobablyrt ought <br /> basements flooding was they <br /> most they <br /> had no priority listings whatsoever• <br /> t for the projected improvements in 1976 v <br /> was 53].8 m dollars.. <br /> • <br /> The estimated cos finalized 9B5 would a$75.6 milliondollars. <br /> 'AI share areasThe outside a study area would be responsible for paYvng[ <br /> of the cost. <br /> ' coiareeM aon asec rtanwer w " <br /> " <br /> let" °tha ""t <br /> mon <br /> e <br /> s <br /> 6is estimated that if ailprojecs wereimplemented except the street <br />;• and basement flooding the$2.50 sewer charge co$5.20 per <br /> . household it1980. f the t prioritystr¢ and b1 flooding <br /> ea the charge would raised o$610 and f 1stleeand <br /> basementflooding w tthechigewouldbrsedth <br /> )k 1etonoeswould ome m 758 ed <br /> $10.10 <br /> he exception the and flooding,154 would be paidfor <br /> id by the tate and 104 wbeifunds. <br /> = <br /> The s all o e ss project <br /> priority list andis <br /> hea <br /> a 121 s frdvt esrge <br /> (3)dhealth impall)pw r Everitt. t impact,s less problems than lmanyist ecitieS established the <br /> �� srpresent <br /> thisfive <br /> annualear lylandtbecause of t additional <br /> '.I <br /> the ts The <br /> dt regarding interceptors,etc.it could help the <br /> -f projects <br /> ereceive a higherypriorrty <br /> 'lf Councilman Overstreet asked if the problem on should be faced ed <br /> -F prior t allowing growth, <br /> ouldgowthhellwedand <br /> f <br /> rob- <br /> , em hninto. <br /> Mr. <br /> Christianson CHUM rill rep <br /> lied <br /> reg <br /> btausetecity <br /> not highe ougghonthe prio`ityy list,grants <br /> Were <br /> - oavailable fgsnatem. )dd` e w <br /> • much growth i the area <br /> could stet,in and <br /> cause problems,either bynsisty gat sewers be installed tee <br /> or <br /> • <br /> ping growth completely• <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Cotmcilman Gipson he replied t e <br /> was the important solution <br /> olutin>ntgrowth <br /> a tion wthrascfar as implementing the.StudymP ] t0, <br /> southwestt eP <br />