My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1979/06/19 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1979/06/19 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:59:06 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:35:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
6/19/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 241 • <br /> Gune 19,1979 <br /> inance Director, <br /> imipl Cushman,ee citizen. They seaof 61 bad been <br /> repliedthat <br /> n< being ua oxnerssions in• <br /> were 3,947 low he <br /> of 61. Two andel and wnershadea opertsn+ the are reportedtherethe <br /> age <br /> at the County Treasurer's fifty-nine <br /> and from this plied fer the re <br /> median of 3,000 senior citizens. they haapcom up with a <br /> Don Strathy,11621 W.Silver <br /> Lake Drive, <br /> reservethe sewer <br /> fund w <br /> told had to be maintained at a certain level to cover the bond <br /> redem <br /> etc.,pfrom thecstate or federa.,and also to keep governments,monies available for matching grants, <br /> 0hcck Thompson,Administrative Assistant,said also that the monies in <br /> te reserve fund would not come close to paying for the replacement of <br /> old sewer <br /> could run into x$ been <br /> sufficient to 25,00000 said care $3when <br /> these t havone ollatime. The rates had eseit <br /> ministration would like to raise the rates rn order to ao this. Ad- <br />, Dave <br /> s,517 Laurel <br /> asked if the <br /> ministration <br /> thereanotherbonda pproposed,,ea would no <br /> or <br /> a• better nswered is was [ tdfor thecitizen <br /> because <br /> he cost and business would be <br />• issue,the other half. However,be ithehalf <br /> citizens had defeated it at the last paying <br /> Jack• La t of10524-24th o the <br /> problem <br /> chargesef the to the senior citizens.arges. He felt here was no need for auction of <br /> Jos• eph Richer,1126 W Silver Lake Drive,spoke favorably on <br /> as a definite need for tram. n the saver area,dna fei�etne�e <br /> teat ue i ape f <br /> nvotizensr cv ,.statEngCatwould be ahharas hipoon hem. or <br /> 0,Mukilteo Drive,informed the Council be was the • <br /> Water <br /> rict. He said they are <br /> Commissioner <br /> icharge lteo at them ter tfor in- <br /> crease <br /> en5s was ein,f paying they would be $10ce .00 t <br /> customers. a equal cost in comparison with the rest of the City illing services. They 1t <br /> pBreeople Mf inly,o tRod,asked i his would <br /> r a vote. He athe proposalbefore them <br /> an ordinance that coo.or <br /> could not be adopted by the Council. At • <br /> this timerates had <br /> decided on,the actual decision as • <br /> en <br /> to whethertan ordinance wouldeeve pared had not been made. <br />• President Aldcroft said <br /> prior to y final ionrbeing lmade.CouncilnAn Langus stated that a law had bee! <br /> d be more public hearings on this <br />. became lower rate. He passed <br /> •state which •receive a <br /> effective that senior <br /> hedthe <br /> given tothe senior citizens at the the ordinance w <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.