Laserfiche WebLink
310 <br /> July 25,1S70 <br /> EMERGENCY ERVICES PROPOSED b - (CB 202-322) <br /> 606Yre,Coordinator for the Emergen,Medical SerVices <br /> He <br /> such a tax, <br /> lehou tax,no district <br /> tonet This can be done eachexplained <br /> e,district,in qual <br /> regarding <br /> to 2rs. zfnty can l the countyor iea <br /> beach taxing <br /> distriet in fore aoievEMS o county-wide,ballot states that <br /> they must have <br /> ps le,would bany ezincad cion to all othethe county with a r levies, of such property tax, <br /> Counci1mdn.Micieson asked i participate £ he <br /> there <br /> wy. eplied if it was a county-wide theCd participate,but the e i <br /> lordinance <br /> that wcdtakenall o unincorporatedy <br /> ,all the cities. <br /> John Mayor of Mountlake Terraceand chairman o£the C r_ <br /> twould b allowed t u questionthe <br /> en raw w regulate answer Medical Services,in s proposed t replied that no city having <br /> o <br /> toseservvce in an ofsome theirrrp orthat wouldent of the inception ofuthetle,.it would become less than it was at the <br /> He said if the cievvy were proposed <br /> on a <br /> county-wide bathe sis,i <br /> t requires 606 <br /> t election. Funds <br /> can only <br /> be used fc they otherfired back department ng equi <br /> lesspment. Tha <br /> county would a smalladministration expensenfor olletionax of jurisdiction, <br /> President n h adecision <br /> would .regulated,etc., he City of Everett would • <br /> bay Make some typef agreement with the co <br /> y prior to their approv- <br /> ing thecounty-wide levy. <br /> if Councilman Baker asked <br /> about <br /> uch money would tele t the City <br /> euteatnha answer was about f it re• p aca aY <were <br /> $1,000. <br /> MayCity funds.said theEverett <br /> avaiult l ble alreadersuade y thhe rough budgeted <br /> al- <br /> readyity of Everett . . <br /> 1 p y anHe felt it hadditional t x forpa god service hey aze <br /> Gipson • <br /> agreed,except a felt t an cit • <br /> would receive <br /> isome other part of zen county, <br /> he same type ofse they weren the CityoEverett v thisco county-wide y ed. <br /> Dick • <br /> ps asked i there was a county-wide n <br /> p i <br /> the Mr.Enbom n connection with <br /> law,buy <br /> planasof no such thereied wasppo6e d tobeaccord the <br /> yet. <br /> Deputy oread a <br /> letterthe advisor for . <br /> 1 <br /> tM additional funds uywouldde levy pCity to keep p with c growth of Everettbyt training more <br /> for <br /> �1 <br />