My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1979/08/29 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1979/08/29 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:05:46 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:42:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
8/29/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 29,1979 <br /> Councilman Baker asked the status of the plan,and PM.Ervine said the <br /> EIS statement is being worked on <br /> nd there is a <br /> roblem <br /> ith the <br /> annexed areas on the east side fa19th ouldpl owinclud those <br /> e plan _ include <br /> e heldpup ucCouncilman 1 would this plan pinclude <br /> • limited access on 19th,andtMr.Ervine said Yes. <br /> Councilman bo <br /> 19th will <br /> e constructed,add Hugh Warren said that if there are any <br /> should be made now as later on it would be more difficult. <br /> It would tchanges ypos separate <br /> Councilif en <br /> but Mr.Warren did not cite <br /> • this. tthe Plans ca.S ordinance fit <br /> for design telling and Mr.Ervine said <br /> il will have to ice the issue of <br /> trixhe= will Ave. <br /> 200 feet approximately,o y policy. <br /> Mr.Ervine <br /> • said the planning concept was to <br /> hve <br /> uses <br /> alon <br /> 19th have thee ex- <br /> iposure to 19th,but have the ty ofet c s 9.along 16th,the <br /> secondaryey haveem and have a series of proposedthrough aufew we streets,including <br /> 102nd, -sacs developed.- <br /> Since ten hve04thand 106th,.w ch wouldbeaccess points. <br /> Councilman <br /> anaec said t side <br /> ould Council state its intentions that access be a eay <br /> • limited on other <br /> side ofethe ns t,it willa based on the limited drivew driveway openings and that if use is eway access. <br /> Councilman Overstreet they will influencing that <br /> by <br /> PCouncil's <br /> and t y planning tud 'rehem Dick <br /> Thompson stated <br /> consistent with study <br /> yesinro <br /> in allowing more drivewaya sesr,nompsen saidstrugglea <br /> ( l0i` • <br /> 4 a plan the wasucilmanBaker w cost and <br /> raffic factor and <br /> some commitment from Council thata e <br /> stay in effect <br /> I. <br /> iS.E vmprovemp thte son,seconded Councilman authorize ter <br /> � ign plans and authorise the ll forAve. <br /> Imo` Moved b Baker,seconded bCouncilman <br /> Pope, <br /> e,to the <br /> r previous motion to alternative bid. me a median strip n certain places an <br /> ,' chelson <br /> andlp called on rocs Ovamended motion with Councilmen erstreet and Baker <br /> -' voting yea,and Councilman son,who.was excused. <br /> I' notion Lost <br /> called o plans a bids <br /> • with all then <br /> treat and , <br /> who voted no,and CouncilmanGipson,who was excused Overstreet <br /> CityI Motion Carried <br /> establish a <br /> poliBcy that there ae <br /> will <br /> be <br /> along 19thAve.S.E.with <br /> access provided of 16th as these areas develop. <br /> • Councilman Baker moved that the City express its ed <br /> curb cuts along 9th Ave.B.E.,but the motion died for lack of a second. <br /> iiiii& <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.