My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1979/08/29 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1979/08/29 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:05:46 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:42:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
8/29/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> August 29,1979 <br /> Jordan s that o o m that it was in <br /> e City's <br /> o loop <br /> system <br /> be installed <br /> b that <br /> and <br /> that they be <br /> compromise <br /> asline,a wtha <br /> the service connection <br /> hook into the 2 line as when the 6''goes in they will abandon <br /> ithwastcloser.p to thes line,bnr y preferred to <br /> wouldcouncilman Pope asked Dick Thompson if the Adrians <br /> the form of an LID o have the h <br /> cityor would the just put t loop line ompsonront fsaid <br /> ruLdcjust be put in as a benefit to the system, <br /> thereon tion fee and added that e both 6"and 12"lines <br /> down Rockefeller and that is how thoseproperties are served. unn g <br /> Jordan at Adrian d <br /> h enteredexchange <br /> with Robertart of the exchange these <br /> • <br /> is hes would suffer afinancial <br /> ave toabbe s nd d dbecauseLes Brin.oEverett and as o e <br /> wat bl <br /> Pringof <br /> had to t problems <br /> back the <br /> pro and also lose thetax benefits o£the exchange. <br /> Sir.Jordan said that by putting the service connection down the alley <br /> where the cost than if it <br /> were to be put in the street,and Councilman Overstreet asked what t • <br /> amount.cost would be,and Mr.Jordan said he did not know the exact <br /> Councilman Overstreet felt the cost would be as muche hook <br /> lfe $5,200. there ab <br /> to the <br /> owner <br /> or just asrvicetion of that <br /> system were looped,hut a <br /> • <br /> , Dick Thompson said there was a State A.ninistrative Code that if weextend <br /> 0.systeM it would require a 6"line from i9e.nore to 5th and <br /> the Adrians are trying to avoid this by putting a service connection <br /> that would run through a City right-of-way tO 5th St. The <br /> itY <br /> s Con- <br /> cerned wi.long service connections in our <br /> -of-ways in tern.of <br /> maintenance and <br /> policy was whether <br /> it was their line or hetn City's and ethat vwaswhy <br /> problemesta <br /> by <br /> Councilman Langus felt there was no <br /> service £ <br /> va y owned service connection sm to trreeok u alley. <br /> p to our yem whth <br /> prissue was whether we should allow a <br /> Councilman Baker <br /> old bOverstreet <br /> felttthe neighbors this area should be notified . 1 <br /> as it hen future and Mrs.Adrian said <br /> Heath end it has a 2that the vacant lot between e running to hispnose.erty was owns r ane <br /> • <br /> Mayor Moore said that Adrian's problem and t Administration sympathy de ce <br /> was Put in nat water lines be <br /> thenp _because the City has been insisting City. Heefelt <br /> because <br /> of the contractor's <br /> l <br /> oughta a proposed a <br /> Lll Lyth vth oddther bbs uild ueerst <br /> ers and developers who <br /> Mr.Jordan's compromise was <br /> and at a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.