Laserfiche WebLink
390 <br /> August 29,1979 <br /> Principal buildings and garages will be prohibited within setback areas. <br /> trees to be removed within side or rear yard setbacks unless deemed <br /> to be diseased,damaged,or a potential blow down by the Everett Parks <br /> Department. <br /> Also,the development pattern in Phase One sball have not more than <br /> 33 percent dupl.development(six lots,or 12 duplex units). <br /> Mr.Ervine said that there shall be dedicated to the City Parks Depart- <br /> , ment,11/2 acres of land on the northern edge of this project,to be sited <br /> so as to be adjacent to properties in shadow Run appropriate for park <br /> purposes,or a fee of opt,5300 per lot shall he paid to the Parks Board <br /> at tne time of final Plat approval,but felt the CitY should aCqUire <br /> the property and not the fee. He stated also that in addition to the <br /> performance bond and indemnity agreement submitted the develoPer( <br /> each contractor performing grading work on the qubject property or con- <br /> structing a house or roadway or other site improvements will be required <br /> to post a bond guaranteeing compliance with the plat condstions and all <br />( I) City ordinances. The bond posted shall be substantial in nature and <br /> 4,I adequate to cover any reasonable potential damage. The Bond will be re- <br /> qnired Prior isseance of the...mg Permits,and CounclIman Overstreet <br /> O5 ingusred Into the length or terms of the bond and how long was the de- <br /> veloper responsible,and Mr.Ervsne said that It shall be a 5 or 10 year <br /> bond,whichever is deemed necessary for the site. <br /> Councilman Overstreet felt that perhaps a decreasing bond after approx. <br /> mately J years could be looked in.)and asked Brad Cattle to check into <br /> f that possibility. <br /> Mr.Ervine reported 0025 152 developer shall pay a 0250.00 fee per 20211000 <br /> I41.1,(15. unit to provide for school services. The payment shall be to the Everett <br /> School system,and Councilman Overstreet wondered if Councal had any say <br /> 4 in whether the school district can extract money from developers,and <br /> Mr.Ervine said that it was his understanding that each local jurlsdsction <br /> has that right and each municipal corporation has to make that deter- <br /> mination. Brad Cattle stated that the subdIvision statute provides that <br />:,(05/j) )5.5 you can require conditIone that go tO sPecifis items end schools cum. <br /> '5.'11,5 be one of those,and if not,also to the general health,safety <br /> fare of the community and then based on evidence in the MS statement or <br /> presented at the public hearing that the fee Is appropriate,Councal <br /> Si could require t. <br /> Mr.Cattle said the school district Itself,except through a levy,does <br /> not have the power to say a certain fee 5.11 be charged. If the school <br /> district requested a fee It would be evaluated. <br />?5) <br /> 00000,171:1',Vi010:1 2210I0100.S011,10,10=3i001 5:500.005s:11502t102 :: <br /> 19,1979. <br /> LIBRARY RESTROOM REMODELING-(CB 798-372) <br /> )(5 <br /> Joe Koslovski reported that the bids received for the Library Restroom <br /> J 5 I RemodelIng came in over budget and he requested the Council hold any <br /> action until more information is received from%eta Construction. <br />' 11, <br /> 111if <br />