My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1979/10/09 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1979/10/09 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:03:51 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:46:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
10/9/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
457 <br /> October 9,1979 <br /> councilman <br /> aceeofa then questioned when the <br /> developer <br /> would bre- <br /> gatta <br /> - <br /> g ppewbsYears, <br /> andedahentim epnedorthe gthis abee <br /> the 1 d be felt <br /> p or when needed. <br /> type of bond guarantee that <br /> light would <br /> question,M t said the cost of <br /> the light might bed byre Attorneyfor .hfor a <br /> traffic <br /> would have if t <br /> would also area <br /> obligate ee loo covenant <br /> ltl successful <br /> to ensure that the hdeveloperaps a fwouldowar owardse bond dthe lightbe the ost <br /> moved mtable <br /> the Councilmanthe motion to grant tentative plat approval and conceptual <br /> PRD approval for Madison Park. <br /> Roll was led with all Councilmen voting yes,except Councilman Baker, <br /> who was exCUSed. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> President Aldcroft again commented on the developed in the near future <br /> e c <br /> property in this area that <br /> vacant <br /> t proposed plat before the Council tonight. <br /> Moved ev Councilman by adding seconded.subject to Councilman <br /> '� <br /> erstreet,to amend <br /> the Planning C come date October 5, 979 a presented <br /> totions set forth in <br /> the council tonight.. <br /> Moved by Councilman os ,seconded <br /> Councilman G <br /> the <br /> conditions <br /> o ,dsubstituting <br /> ttthe <br /> alternative recreation section <br /> for condition would read sfollows: <br /> nTe shall be 1-1/ a c open sa <br /> ded o theuse of the M I1. n <br /> l8of thcondominiums (Phases and space residents <br /> b improved a time ed III <br /> do not develop as proposed Pled Residential Development), City <br /> would then acquire <br /> l /2 acres for park purposes during e normal <br /> plttingp cep. <br /> ts Roll was called oh <br /> es,except <br /> CouncilmanPope,whovotedn,,amendment voting <br /> and Councilman Baker,whowasy <br /> d. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Mr.Arvine then reported that a petition had been received in <br /> opof potto ion <br /> signatures on petition oe PrOPosel Signed pposing psig he property total <br /> PRD a plat. <br /> George D e developers,said manY of tte condition.esfabiArbef for <br /> this plat had er he <br /> verett rlanning <br /> bad addressed b fu <br /> Department, a recorded intheminutes. This letter as as follows: <br /> • <br /> ii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.