Laserfiche WebLink
459 <br /> October 9,1979 <br /> (a) It is not part of any legally adopted ordinance. <br /> nor (b) It is not beingappliedpredominately <br /> plats short plats which edomina elys single-family,such <br /> as Pacific Avenue to 41st Street. • <br /> item. <br /> ,pe <br /> Community <br /> 0;Item Assessments b),p item 13,paragraph 1,page 9. <br /> The 5141000 to$180,000 fors schools is not <br /> being <br /> applied u , against of stherefore discriminatory and <br /> should <br /> e eted. <br /> Reaso.: 6w,tN <br /> ou its,plats and short plats are currently issued • <br /> su <br /> Aril l andles a Gregoire t that x <br /> impact...eat s n mf plat.. The m s filtime,and ed on September 8, <br /> of ichMost <br /> both did..dojects did <br /> a the a pact statements,subsequently, <br /> s approved <br /> without ees, require same <br /> 3. o iscrimin criterion or fees has been established. <br /> Nondiscriminatory <br /> platting i (then unpiatted projects such <br /> as the 150-unit yr is <br /> criterion <br /> no sed. <br /> (b) plattingisa thenar sed <br /> y land was platted f more intense u f 181-1/2 lots <br /> nr1893 a th only a empt to utfliseoa less in a andk <br /> more c table a wi <br /> Dm(c) If Planning C Council r <br /> is the <br /> criterionthen n r vi wed projects a unfairly favored. <br /> then that has not been • <br /> bushed a permits <br /> n established for the different <br /> classes of building permits,such as residential,business,commercial, <br /> etc. (e) if platting iscriterion replats and some short <br /> plats will be double taxed fort same fee. <br /> 4 Fees(a)represent 1811/ 2 paid many thousands of dollars to <br /> supportentitles plat 1891:state <br /> schools,tc ity,tstreets,school�district,port district and <br /> local tax <br /> entities. <br /> (bl The courts have determined that education is a state <br /> rather than <br /> localobligation. <br /> New sewer and w together with fees will create <br /> double taxation at thisae <br /> Funds for parks c fees and t general <br /> f e discriminatory double nt on <br /> un 5.or policy o requiringadditionalpark land or fees <br /> attempttoprovide private r amenities <br /> far n lie of future community tax lburdensnfor par <br /> costs <br /> 6. Membersofthe <br /> maintenance.ark D ,including Robert <br /> stated theufollowing: <br /> Jim Shields, inspected the site and <br /> (a) They did not anticipate having funds to maintain the <br /> proposed park for at least 5 years. <br />