Laserfiche WebLink
577. <br /> • <br /> ' December 5,1979 <br /> 1 site <br /> of 20.5 sting theeleeep • <br /> syope onyy 19 acres• <br /> Family d this 222 units <br /> The project before <br /> multi-family <br /> tu <br /> • located, condominiums e do <br /> n <br /> open spaces, 14 atres of open pa including bcreek <br /> channel <br /> pathway, <br /> otbuilding and <br /> aim off Fleming bcul-de-aac with em_g c <br /> y <br /> access from <br /> • <br /> Cady <br /> ' He said an existing 6"line in Fleming Rd.an4^on Cady a <br /> lin <br /> • <br /> will lines the <br /> hPe1 <br /> in <br /> Fleming 1ellet anda1lfts npump <br /> sewein5lnn on Fleming. Storm water runoff wbe handled per <br /> City drainage served <br /> Fleming off <br /> d by emergencyentrance off aydf it fire protection. <br /> . He then pointed out that.at a regular e <br /> d- comresidential use of this area and 5 prehensive land <br /> Pecal <br /> it o 10 a „ <br /> complianceproject is in existing <br /> zoning 2,w ng <br /> un acre <br /> would. the Project <br /> p a 9 P Projectthe <br /> exbected to generate between 1,050 to 1,400 vehicle trips per day,whichwill access from Fleming Rd. The impact on 1 'ming is primarily the <br /> • <br /> increasnt raffic is 600 vehicles <br /> • <br /> per day. The conflicts <br /> th pedestrian.proposes 1 tennis court and acres <br /> le system.peTepace with activeareas.consisting r <br /> ecreation • <br /> '1 Yh ld d most reasonable to provide sace which Y p 1 tn the future we..be b <br /> eloPed <br /> into whatever facilities a desired b e homeowners organization. <br /> Realistic physical access to properties east ofCr ekside via the <br /> is not now available and d appea <br /> existing in the future. A 20 e ide s <br /> privateb f 'would maintain legal access if ever needed. <br /> conditionHe also pointed out in ell set <br /> forth by t <br /> he Planning Comissitc <br /> •• an additional sentence would be needed <br /> programin the north and Doth <br /> sewer i <br /> = <br /> improvement shall required".• <br /> Council •Franz Thuyns,project architect,stated the plan before <br /> • <br /> allowed h possible. <br /> Pointed o that reserving prp <br /> drainage facility <br /> • <br /> in uouldeb nappro a telyt525a0 cost of <br /> Langan askedw n 0 d ft r final pap ork went thio g <br /> the answer was to ly 9 ay a e. <br /> • <br /> p 310 Pacific Ave., f the Project, <br /> felt t ntthere would. here was continuedapprovalia1-taffordable.units.:He lPe growth,t as long s <br /> • e bthe units were heing bug ilt a code, heprice of the unit was not <br /> important. = 000 552nd t the PRD,PerticularlY <br /> Pat <br /> on,of <br /> because of the ention pond in the area that was proposed. <br /> He ndedsmov g drainage theadetention pond to another location near <br /> Mukrltee Blvd. <br />