Laserfiche WebLink
587 <br /> December 12,19]9 <br /> Pat Beckdoldt,of the Everett Police Department,said he w no <br /> with theh isco but uld need some assurance that they <br /> would not jusuld have totPapply <br /> witift <br /> the C could issue u <br /> license.license under that would c the <br /> snohomrsh County0 see what screening do for then types of licenses. <br /> Steven Hunt,of the Stanley Smith Security Agency,spoke on the fee issue <br /> and felt it was too much to assess. <br /> councilman Baker tthat scounty-widelobbying should <br /> change the system as that might be the only way to solve these problems. <br /> President Aldcroft asked if anyonewished to Speak and no One replied. <br /> moved by President Aldcroft,seconded b on 6 <br /> License from$10.00 ou$15.00tf <br /> tPpatrolman/securityrg rd and to reduce the 0$25.00 fee t x$15100 <br /> for denial. <br /> anliclsneaCouncilmen voting no,except Councilmen Langus • <br /> dMheond President Alder. who voted yes. <br /> Motion Lose <br /> Moved by c Baker, ae Gipson,t a para- <br /> graph D under <br /> r xn6r which the accept m <br /> Snohomish County which n placeinto <br /> category the City s long as the County does an adequate job of <br /> screening. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmenvoting yes,except Councilman Pope, <br /> who voted no. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> eludeby Councilman 0undertseconded by Councilman Pope. <br /> a appeal process Section 5(Gs outline <br /> y he Assistant <br /> City Attorney. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Councilman Overstreet ked if thecustomer list is confidential and h w <br /> could this be done if it <br /> Cattle, i <br /> replied <br /> that language could be inserted a thelistsconfidentiality. He <br /> said there was no guarantee that through some unauthorized means this <br /> information would not get out. • <br /> Mayor Mooreasked tolze excused at this time. <br /> Moved by C s(Sodiaman Michelson,to <br /> delete Section from the proposed ordinance. <br /> cilmen ksng the <br /> Police De Put neede y poe of possible to ao a prop ray' <br /> jab. <br />