Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 595 <br /> December 19,1979 <br /> Roll was called on the wain e Permit,with <br /> andtAldc� voting Yee,and Councilmen lope, <br /> Michelson ata Baker voting <br /> Motion Carried <br /> ORDINANCE 555 APPEAL-WE 7912-516) <br /> had been received from the willim Hulbert <br /> Hugh <br /> any who pe parking lot at b 3116 Colby. <br /> aid thm 555-78 the <br /> said <br /> t proposes <br /> eNo [ hog im- <br /> rstandard installedlhr w num.5 to <br /> imntethe emeat was <br /> react aadditionalEt cracks <br /> theus sidewalk lessen <br /> gme f failure w sultainefurther <br /> i <br /> heavedledgest replacementreplacement.curbs uire <br /> have <br /> parking facility will becompletely failed..d replaced ed byy aential structure <br /> futurein the near <br /> uipmen d obuil e <br /> will troytherequ impprovementequipment <br /> r rwaivedequested <br /> i <br /> s no assurance that <br /> it will b repIf a lacedninfconstructed,acility is <br /> the foreseen future. He said alternatives available • <br /> include:Waive requirements of the MC 13 .010 a e 555-7e <br /> without <br /> any change to existing public improvements as requested <br /> bYthe applicant. <br /> 2). (a) Require replacement f hap alk and power of• . <br /> Attorney f remaining improvements. <br /> • (b) placement e sidewalkand c and for remainingd b <br /> Replacement <br /> improvements. (Inthat1 pour of sidewalk and cur <br /> will s replacement) <br /> 3) iL.I.D.Power of Attorney or replacementof all im- <br /> provements. <br /> q) 9e <br /> i and applicationv <br /> of public improvementsincNon- <br /> Significance <br /> uding <br /> alley, <br /> fsidewalka s required by Declaration on- <br /> r anc an Ordinance 555-]8. <br /> 5) Galley i mens now and Power of Attorney for <br /> rHe said their recommendation is that Council accept Alternate Y4 0 <br /> require compliance with applicable City and regulations. <br /> ations. <br /> Councilman <br /> ked i this that theywere not ad- <br /> dressing <br /> contrary t Committee - <br /> working on a the answer was <br /> dressing his issue at all. <br /> Councilman Overstreet asked i retaining <br /> dwould be left,and <br /> Mr.Warren replied yes skethe paringlot would a the top level <br /> of the proPertY. <br /> proposed on,constructed representing eeid <br /> e <br /> ttion of an ee nt hobutuse be- <br /> causefel <br /> this had been <br /> that if <br /> walk were required,at such time as the apartment house • <br /> were o. walk and thecnewsidewalk <br /> would be <br /> destrer and water lines oyed. <br /> He <br /> anggold have to go across odHporrtion <br /> of the alley was in agree that the curb needed repairing and agreed to do this. <br />