Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> �i 54 <br /> January 30,1980 <br /> President Overstreet annonced the Council <br /> ll for the <br /> and ms ordinancte forodayuv <br /> sewer system improvements had be noplans <br /> from the <br /> BALES REZONE RECONSIDERATxON-Ice 801-41) <br /> Georio Gregoire oggorreeg <br /> that aa E12th,1 <br /> after 2 motions failing <br /> d that inasmuch <br /> as t to hthe <br /> interim <br /> zoning <br /> the <br /> leae <br /> rty <br /> stands <br /> the AAdministration opo pro- <br /> eproposal <br /> Council nn a permanent zoning of <br /> the area lformerly <br /> compromise <br /> avrezoning less <br /> 156 slope <br /> from9 inSuburban P _ amly <br /> Density. d. property lay on weaving an excess of 153 slope nt side as ad <br /> jacent <br /> hapresentlyaA <br /> and <br /> to R-S inle Family <br /> an <br /> l. The <br /> a to the east of <br /> pLarimer tron8od.two <br /> uld north,aibe rezoned from A-1 Agricultural <br /> n in A-1 as presently just s f prang tzo hnedechreept fl <br /> s R-for a smal <br /> Council <br /> on Baker understood when the <br /> jacent to Larimer <br /> zoned R-S this was not to be an interim m _ - e zone.she Shi sther aid she haddnbiiityo <br /> rob- <br /> lems <br /> in <br /> the azthe <br /> changedto R-1,as it would obviously become mohe area re <br /> highlyt <br /> populated..• President Overstreet asked - <br /> if the A-1 area was actually the only interim <br /> zone <br /> trop of theordithe nnance ance. <br /> nance. s <br /> eestablished, <br /> Attorney, <br /> adop d -5 was not intheterim <br /> interim <br /> Al.r c ded by Councilman <br /> one the properties <br /> -S designation to <br /> R leand on9 hes Ytsless <br /> s8 from its current r <br /> g erallyl 8 slope or greaterion of the Administration and fromA-1 to 11-5. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> dstetter,representing the applicant in the BalesRezo proposal, <br /> hisaid Eraclientcompromise,that this waclient has not seenthis ps <br /> o he was <br /> not <br /> • prepared repared by <br /> the staff dt sthe Admdnistration.aid hisclient's position <br /> was <br /> es <br /> were happy with the present zoning,or they would approve overall R- <br /> zone throughout the whole area. <br /> He agreed with aBaker had <br /> dm stating that <br /> tt <br /> h <br /> e <br /> OrdinanceSteep Slope edoiR <br /> He suggested if - established belimited to the <br /> 3 areas where e property owners have voiced this <br /> and the <br /> petitioned by the balance of <br /> • rest of the area be left in the R-S zone as <br /> the property owners at the December 12th meeting. <br /> Mayor dhe received after <br /> being presented proposal. with a copy of it said in this case h[ agree <br /> qwith <br /> therp al <br /> q tedthat er pp cyrbrzoed -1. he"rmed <br />