Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br /> !' <br /> 1 January 30,1980 <br /> ry'IDepartment <br /> L 'f14�1 <br /> this f <br /> utilized becauselatted f f . - <br /> Y <br /> a.al particularly the <br /> area <br /> hbeen <br /> oan <br /> oakes t difficult apply some oour current rdinances tor o this TIT.' <br /> of Plat. <br /> Xl <br /> 1 BNob e,,rai <br /> n <br /> geelaeoaf aY51P h 9 Lltmedeu <br /> eloop <br /> 5 <br /> 1 <br /> Sea <br /> h. <br /> rstf, <br /> also esnt protest. <br /> endedhleycfx 9lgabut�thciodhaNnof beevn hrecord. <br />� ` ome eNeminesned Ner Paenvbe toveand tbaeawd etc. <br /> § treets <br /> CouncilmanPope ked d utilities M Gregoiresaid aa and there <br /> be <br /> Reid Y representing the explainedthto they wanted <br /> the <br /> eidunderstand they had gone considerable <br /> ents in the area to <br /> to infthem and receive input regarding therapines <br /> He fel h eevarious public hearings h been <br /> ` addressed and was a 1 erred at the presented today. <br /> COUNCIL BILL N0.7912-533 <br /> READING:FINAL <br /> amending th ity o <br /> d by Ee vn a 19, <br /> ordinances 3572(sounaviewaeaol num pa code Title <br /> l I Movedby Councilman Gipson,seconded by Councilman that the <br /> aet <br /> ddiofCaucicilBill N 912-533 Ihereby <br /> declared to be the rd <br /> F and final rand the <br /> s directed Call o ll far he <br /> final disposition of the ordinance. <br /> Langu <br /> Boll Call: Ayes: s'Michelson,paldcroftZ6Pope <br /> street <br /> Baker <br /> FF .gyp' Absent. motion Lost <br /> d by Councilman Aldcroft,seconded <br /> ilman Michela.,to de, <br /> oasis ids he area ° o is consistent with <br /> the erequestwithathe property use in propertyint <br /> would the property <br /> consistent rens a la <br /> 'ailAy' t and use plan. <br /> , <br /> :) President Overstreet <br /> tresaid <br /> a g <br /> Approval <br /> then <br /> vgagainst theordinancecoulddevelopers <br /> llfelt if the Council were <br /> voting against the PRO concept <br /> they should before 1 <br /> change the FED ordinance. fthey voting <br /> against the actUal PRO <br /> then perhaps thia should be done previous to the final reading f the <br /> tfordinance. <br /> t <br /> s k;€ <br />