My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/02/27 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/02/27 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:08:41 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:58:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
2/27/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
....._ __...__... . . <br /> 110 <br /> February 27,1960 <br /> councilman Gipson said he could possibly see some <br /> would <br /> bother him and feels the Council should have the opportunity e <br /> changes to a project he <br /> reasons for doing o should b passed on o Planning commassiOCouncil feels it-should be rejected n. <br /> Bud and Minn raised the question of their given <br /> take stock in them and v basic findings a policies. <br /> information <br /> order to make responsible recommendations and staff and Council shl <br /> Jim <br /> Director o Development,suggested <br /> furnishing t c Community <br /> the information they.think necessary, <br /> this area should be discussed fu at somefuture time. <br /> President Overstreet dthe Planning Department checks areas of impact <br /> • development (sewer,schools, te.)and if heyfind <br /> a possible impact y ca establish a fee. <br /> • Dick Thompson asked that the availability cf staff be recognized. Many <br /> on staff ave itasks can be accomplished but there just se much that can be done based <br /> y. <br /> • <br /> Councilman Baker stated she favored an annlial goal setting meeting. <br /> President someground on the <br /> proposed disadvantages of heniner issue.and ask.having a hearingexaminer. x on advantages.and <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Councilman Michelson ie felt a would cut down the <br /> amount of time spent by ta full-tame examiner. ehe rated her one part-time. <br /> ganning Commission tdthink we needed <br />' ) u l restablished• <br /> a <br /> oft n g Commission and felt there should beatransitory periods <br /> j • Bob Hummel stated he felt the hearing o time. kgreat xamiou <br /> of time in ld be v <br /> one and bg <br /> hearvngsandthat work now don y'!people would t 1. holding <br /> arenlea y yelled out E nam g a part-time examiner until the duties <br /> • Tanis Marsh,Planning Commission said <br /> odi ndsy good idea to <br /> examiner, <br /> buensaare a ieto be tiednds <br /> up in the Comprehensive <br /> ere <br /> on the part of the examiner. She suggested <br /> first and favors good transitsperiod. thxins care ofernese things <br /> hproblemon <br /> tasks the break can be made to establish certain level cof opindependence. <br /> dep not <br /> en <br /> • <br /> i y oarefn anaeper <br /> • and a good mplementate nsplan s, p, ly emeters set <br /> Councilman Pope suggested that Council work with <br /> j on this eerie. xamrn plan and suggested sett gnupganother meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.