My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/03/05 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/03/05 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:09:19 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 9:59:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
3/5/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ir122 <br /> March 5,1900 <br /> ill 1 Councilman Gipson felt we should state what each will provide and who <br /> ,14 will pay. <br /> Mayor Moore felt t uvoters <br /> have to vote <br /> this. have no control ovee rates being charged <br /> in <br /> to iThis indstrybelongs to the taxpayer. t <br /> thatv. he would like <br /> Mr. ulbertattend the Washington, <br /> D.C. <br /> that is scheduled <br /> and <br /> ont this problem. Me sari doing <br /> le <br /> sometimes eslonger. <br /> President Overstreet asked <br /> if t h decision-making <br /> -� y uis a Cl desef with ncil keeps saying <br /> decision <br /> to respond as to whatM1 he City to do as far as criteria. <br /> Hulberthe policyh <br /> T , lbbuild f d 1 N y <br /> : <br /> n you <br /> compare capital <br /> aintenance and operation costs to maintenance <br /> andshould he <br /> bbe uilt broadened <br /> d Dick Thompson i decision Process <br /> that s e ang vie response. <br /> IMr. b h thata <br />{, Il o" replied h had presented a1/9o <br /> tg accepted. Sine <br /> willing eHuleras d <br /> � thatv =ono <br /> i'!,:',,,1' <br /> b <br /> e <br /> b <br /> of all responsibility if given and oSones <br /> ttMwaaoneaPPro building <br /> h sunction with <br /> e,li[ a fvltratvonplawould h savings in ac <br /> cost m <br /> 1 asked if the qualityh hwillbeaffc <br /> t <br /> e <br /> d <br /> and is why we Thompson h the problem <br /> { March el IS figure. <br /> [!111'11i Councilman tshould felt some time be taken to studyhason of relinquishing d then ethewltentnw and <br /> I[4[ t.n sea'wi benefit ailBice then h thh <br /> economic <br /> masibili t should <br /> nmeasured and la'It <br /> '1111 <br /> t it badvantageous to the i o <br /> Mayor M feltpalatable which; an d d ih dber <br /> flualitY act or theyhould Jrovide funding could <br /> n plant.�[[I our k 0aejeopardize <br /> 4 stated thatwe 6o12monthsthose costs will be <br /> Ip 1 passed tote citizen in rate Increases. In the k , ale heconsidered iombavghave <br /> are t.the options can be hebe inflated,1 I asked Councilthese in depth. <br /> I wrk: ttttgDi d y 1wrt11level of <br /> study it et <br /> retrpaying at a ow level of interest. <br /> 11 <br /> 1411 <br /> AP-, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.