Laserfiche WebLink
I 158 <br /> ry April 2,1900 <br /> TERMINATION AGREEMENT WITH P.U.D. <br /> Brad Cattle,City Attorney,presented a terminationagreementinvolving a <br /> joint underground projected that along <br /> d rand Avenuewith P.U.D. Theoriginal <br /> agreement e- <br /> he Cityls portion of <br />'.'�. tilitiesia nolongerablr obligation.tstated hese <br /> P.U.D. a like t <br /> use these ands and have requested termination of thisagreementin order <br /> Moved by to I <br /> r to sign a ion econded cilman onto authorize <br /> the oo nt underground <br /> Pr] along the 1900-2000block of Grand Avenue. <br /> calledI Roll was all C g yes Councilmen i. g , <br /> • <br /> Aldexoft and President Overstreet,who were excused. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING PLAT OF CEDAR LANE (CB 803-144) <br /> Gerry Ervine,of the PDepartted that the Plat of Cedar <br /> Lane consisting of7 a a Mata a 12h <br /> a the rezone n <br /> betweenarea was located Avenue and <br /> between and <br /> Avenues,and ill be developed i 2 phases. Phasei s of 2 <br /> sing and <br /> will be 15 lots. Present zoning is R-S <br /> anrezoneBalwould <br /> single <br /> family low <br /> from fm11a parcel. <br /> tdthat l <br /> is C-1 and...rounding <br /> oninaC-5a a pro <br /> posed rezone <br /> eagalt higher density <br /> the <br /> north, <br /> south and and tdensity g to h <br /> iMr.Ervine <br /> existing <br /> od iextendedtaervehissite and sewer service provided n ways. <br /> ater mains <br /> l be <br /> ad been <br /> 1. <br /> f } nineasked v received several had idbetroas <br /> to possible <br /> [n traffic in the area <br /> Councilman Baker asked about land bei ed az <br /> purposes <br /> r p <br /> [[ed fee for pa and Geri, <br /> Ervine said this had not been made a <br /> lver ake Park was <br /> approximately <br /> o CreekCorridor. y i the Par pa had <br /> and the andthe <br /> Commented n this and the reply was <br /> into putting <br /> IP Gipson s d development., 0 in an internal play area for younger children in the He also <br /> felt developers should be required to land for park es or <br /> be charged a fee in lieu of this requirement. <br /> Gerry Ervine stated in <br /> other o$300 per lot had been assessed <br /> for sincondition <br /> could be <br /> ed but felt this should be reviewed by the Council, <br /> approval b Council.Planning staff and <br /> Parks Department and worked o prior to final pat <br /> l. <br /> Councilman Michelson asked where monies for park improvements are Put and <br /> Mr.Cushman,Finance Director,said we have a <br /> recommended land for acquisition of <br /> park land in .011 fund but <br /> t strictly the area contributing hese fees. <br />