My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/05/21 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/05/21 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:15:21 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:05:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
5/21/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br /> 245 . <br /> I <br /> May 21,1880 ... <br /> 5 <br /> staff and 1 men8aer of the Public Works staff. Mrs.McCutcheon agreed <br /> to serve as the member of the community,and Hugh Warren will be the <br /> lead person to arrange the meetings. This committee was requested to <br /> report back to Council within 30 days if feasible. <br /> Gerald Crane,representing Associated Sand 6 Gravel,suggested that since <br /> they would be sharing in the cost of the project they should have a I <br /> representative on the committee also,and accepted the aPPoinrment when <br /> asked if he would be willing to serve. . <br /> Moved by Councilman Langus,seconded by Councilman Gipson,to direct the • <br /> staff to prepare an ordinance vacating a portion of OPP.Midge Road hAsed <br /> on the recommendations of an Advinory Committee appointed by the Mayor. <br /> motion Carried <br /> Councilman Baker returned to the meeting at this time. I ,5 <br /> PUBLIC BEARING-LAND USE NEARING EXAMINER SYSTEM-(CB 804-131) ,I <br /> Dennis Derickson,of the Planning Department,stated the office of the , .. <br /> Land rise Hearing Examiner bad been proposed because of the increased <br /> workload of the Planning Commission. The examiner will assume some of I I( i(I, <br /> the responsibilities of the Planning Commission thus allowing them more <br /> time to attend to the critical tasks concerning land use <br /> anplanning policy II <br /> issues d updating the City's zoning and sublivision ordinancen. Mr. <br /> Derickson stated this office would be substantially self-supporting <br /> financially ro as not to be a drain on the general fund. He stated that ', ,,,:'.1, <br /> Section 3 ha an addition that states.It is further provided that to the <br /> ER, maximum extent feasible,the office of the Hearing Examiner shall be <br /> financially self-supporting through reliance upon application and related , , <br /> user fees." , <br /> d. <br /> Ted Schnielber,representinq Master Builders Association,stated they felt <br /> LEAD system would be Cl asset to the City as time saved in the process <br /> is money saved. He did <br /> ty thing as SD ot eethink in the long run it would cost the II''I I:(11 <br /> Cianyit wilfrrhe Planning Commission for other matters. <br /> I' 41 <br /> Nick Halliday,(rePresenting <br /> Ihearing examiner process is in use in Xing County and in working well. <br /> He felt basically everyonewassatisfied with the decisions made and <br /> supported adoption of the system in Everett. <br /> Male Chism,of So.(bird Street,Lowell,asked about Section 16 regarding <br /> posting notices,and Dick Thompson stated notices are posted on the <br /> property itself in 2 conspicuous places. <br /> Ms.Chism also requested At notificatiolls be mailed to property owners . <br /> , <br /> I( 5 <br /> within 500 feet of the subject property instead of 300 feet,and also <br /> that the Ordinance read that notification be made to identifiable , <br /> neigsborhood organizations. , <br /> Councilman Pope asked.3(m Geniesse,Chairman of*he Planning Commission, <br /> a how the hearing examiner system woul,affect the Commission,and Mr. <br /> Geniesse said they had taken smaller items and shifted these to the 11 I .1 <br /> examiner and kept larger items,approximately 50%of the workload,which <br /> they felt would give them time to work on the comprehensive plan,elr. <br /> and the Commission looks at the orDice of hearing examiner as a step , 1 <br /> in the right direction. <br /> 055 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.