My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/07/16 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/07/16 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:18:26 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:08:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
7/16/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 16,1990 325 <br /> 1. /t semas to be the overwhelming feeling of tie people i the,their e <br /> neighborhood t <br /> safeavrable welfare,athat tincreas g e his area is • <br /> 2. The inaPPropriateness of the existing zoning has not been shown. <br /> 3. :pComprehensive <br /> _ eallsints y,as we know it.ond to the Plan,the <br /> There <br /> 4 multi-family <br /> thous n <br /> g in the area under existing zoning. <br /> ly exists excessive development of duplex d <br /> 5. The proposeone-halfhree and e <br /> d R- intrudes into ob by R <br /> s' would be incompatible <br /> withzoning n <br /> the R-1 z e,aand therefo therefore does act s a buffer zone. <br /> 6' <br /> vehicular fo thearesidents ofthe area,acts both pedestrian and <br /> • 3t been <br /> zonedsufficient land <br /> for multiple mfamily residential <br /> innEv <br /> srett or that this <br /> is thenmost apzonediatee family <br /> nfor additionalemu multiple family <br /> He said the staff <br /> he <br /> do edi <br /> po <br /> os <br /> ee <br /> eczoa <br /> he <br /> of <br /> explained previous meting engwere inhl.thetcounc packet.atha Been <br /> nt • <br /> 19constructed was zoned R-2 in 196656 this area was zoned R-1 and E area to the north where the 'I•He said in . <br /> • <br /> r9Councilman A f asked h any ued under nits <br /> 1 zone and <br /> Mr. v repliedt2 Councilman Michelson et task <br /> ed if there was any <br /> an <br /> that no discussion action hadbeentaken entrance <br /> thisElm <br /> all StreetPresident replywas <br /> what changes hadab n m andtakenthatcreatedproval • <br /> for this a and Mr.made <br /> replied <br /> side whichewwouldse mate a through street and thereforhe felt s <br /> at on hthiuw <br /> justified rezone. as <br /> ion <br /> Cou <br /> al re request <br /> an Mr.Ervine replope then asked ied thereow units ld be eighty unitser this rezone <br /> Reid • <br /> 5 o repro the applicantsthe h comprehensive for new ways plan e <br /> andrezone are find <br /> n effset ective use The downer ehas agwas a reed t <br /> he staff. He said this type of project meets the housing <br /> needs in <br /> he City. It <br /> come down il not <br /> through a raneighborhood and there are no idirect access to Mukilteo Blvd.dentified effects <br /> n public a or schools. • <br /> ing was adopted <br /> in 956pointing <br /> t r directlytn <br />; Plan has been geoea orth of the rtheons,he said since n- <br /> 3 to the <br /> north adjacent to <br /> d Place. Also,to the <br /> d whethevth ] <br /> PrOVed <br /> dnafromthat <br /> 49 oughutotWo was <br /> Placekand he def w plat was pf t 4 <br /> thia. Mr. y felt this v indication that atheaR ddbetex- <br /> panded to south to this plat adjacent t0 49thwhere it.was R-1 single <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.