Laserfiche WebLink
345 <br /> July 3,1980 <br /> Moved by Cow seconded by Councilman Pope,to accept the <br /> Findings of Fact <br /> l.angul °asions of Law fion <br /> nviroumental Review Committeed deny the appeal recomM°o <br /> Non-Significance regarding General Hospital.; £Declaration of <br /> Roll was l=d wire a we"e'v ting Ye'. <br /> cept cowoilmen a er <br /> Gipson, wer exc s, ak <br /> Motion Carried <br /> • <br /> Councilman Gipson returned to the meeting at this time. <br /> (COPUBLIC HEARING-PUGET SOUND PRD- <br /> 606-231) <br /> Brad Cattle,city Attorney,requestedthe attorneys representing the <br /> • <br /> t the <br /> ent and beginni ppm£t <br /> °ts to raise any procedural gueaCions they might h <br /> n9 this public hearing. have <br /> residents of Gary B pederaofAWilcox Allendoer£er 5 Wilcox,representing the <br /> Act Federal <br /> Avenue, <br /> ,raised the issue a violationof Apppearence <br />• of Fairness the representation of Mre <br /> alsohe Planning <br /> vseidnh was and his client being unrepresented. Mr. <br /> Mr tBrandstette <br /> • <br /> he told that Mr. <br /> .B represented a members o <br /> Councilasked if isclbaurei addition,heesaid here w <br /> member ofythe the public he fare that Mr.Baker's wifes <br /> time Council- <br /> President over said Council amembers excuse themselves F <br /> rom time to <br /> Bakerhasdonee sowhere regardingethis issue. <br /> conflict o interest and Councilman <br /> Billhe Baker,Attorney <br /> iSound <br /> Service.Corporation, <br /> edanoostsissuewithanyof the members of ouncrletthisain9a d that no onflict of interest existed with members so£the Council or the Planning Commission. <br /> hlmel£man Gipsonstated that <br /> Mr,Baker had represented his son but not <br /> • <br /> • d,en <br /> of F tcoucld o inteeeideoatvthetCouncilth A <br /> p <br /> oe <br /> p. <br /> ro <br /> ne <br /> dwith the <br /> public hearing. <br /> Dennis <br /> block <br /> Sin <br /> regore,o£the Planning 0esaid this proposed Planned <br /> ResideDevelopment l on side o dal in the Ube of Grandview consisted of <br /> e• The zoning is R-1gle-Fauls0Rs_ al which single family <br /> a e00square flemmiiyeiitThe proposede zoning <br /> niels be to R-1 Single-FLow-Density Residential Ptzwustsingle family nitin lr clusters and3 single familydeachedhus. deue parking',and <br /> e ° icneAslFederal ue. Heaidthe density would <br /> be less than allowabe for this property. <br /> a. <br /> would <br />• Gregoire approximately 19u1200 more vehicles p will b <br /> sid generated on Federal <br /> 1 Avenue which wo dnothave.anadverseeeffect. He <br /> and thedrainage <br /> pressure P adequate,sews s is adequate, <br /> e <br /> reuse problems. <br /> SAHjeS.tmatheal-rond nda a wan dbyrbbS Prelfminabyo P r vel <br /> 9 v a�W't1on,ts t,:Ecrth pp.Tbe_elanning �mavwselon.p <br /> • <br />