My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/07/30 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/07/30 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:19:58 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:10:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
7/30/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
355 <br /> JulY 50, 980 <br /> Counci cide to have itz own maaniBaker sufficient ked.i t e C should de <br /> be based p ]ected revenue, ill Cushman Alred t program could <br /> ofyoMoo said 16 out the persons contactedwas negative <br /> feelings <br /> l concerrs <br /> by special levy,have a 25C per raproposed lan and volced sssame suas s ons and c opposed ome small <br /> ntracting for medicald small cities now <br /> 5 evy and could not offer-present <br /> bilty an jurisdictionwereconcern. <br /> ces with <br /> t11..515°51., outters <br /> 61a/10r Moore stated sitme it <br /> Vofat this plan does not <br /> failure <br /> ela county-vide <br /> h b possibility <br /> ntis Admirmstration's recommendation to not run <br /> yxide EMS levy in 1900. He said if <br /> inter- <br /> local to go with <br /> the levy, endsevery effort establish <br /> Cowith the nnell as xdm <br /> me dac level y if m- <br /> e on <br /> reased <br /> 51c00p ed Present <br /> luaiion. b tlevy c 251per <br /> Lynnwood <br /> oM,stated they proposed a <br /> y- Z <br /> years ago and negative <br /> respo <br /> se At that time. South <br /> re a, iahead <br /> k establish h do not Said there is concern over the question fdoe <br /> Plan is an llth hour He d proposal that <br /> changed feeto placate some. Mayor ls <br /> will be <br /> htheac t but erked is out. He <br /> also said esented were not realistic and <br /> t the <br /> is area Woul <br /> h llY <br /> admin d stration are resolved, Y d not support the <br /> plan at citizens timee. <br /> evy. Until concerns of funding nthrsp <br /> Fire <br /> rereturned to the <br /> quest Garber,that allt b 1 ybbe Cotmcil <br /> r was o ollected. Be also statedhewas not satisfied withethe <br /> Ball <br /> felt the <br /> e time of a <br /> C <br /> Mayor Stevens, epos <br /> and paramedicunit stationed oulldbeobfbenefit tocitizet be left off <br /> the ls, edid not favor any more did not favor this teanested l e bet plan could be formulapresent to the <br /> ot <br /> e or seen onpthis posalthanked pr.Steven marks for the UM' <br /> and <br /> Dr.Marks stated the primary purpose of <br /> e plan is to provide a desired <br /> leve <br /> through this plan as It 1 of procomvides <br /> h this <br /> ould <br /> be lished <br /> oes not currently <br /> exist in the County,does not <br /> does ,but op <br /> criteria <br /> his planhas been introduced by those <br /> or not 1 hves this he tial h would have the of h they wanted this service and urged Comm.to approvehe,County-wide <br /> or <br /> oore <br /> City wide levy after <br /> the <br /> defCounty-wide t ge i b <br /> tvtaddby ding to <br /> admbnvstratbon ands defibr�illatvon vn cardiac arrest cases. adding g d g <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.