My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980/09/03 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1980/09/03 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 10:22:15 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 10:12:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
9/3/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
401 <br /> September 3,1980 <br /> Falk <br /> Kelm, <br /> Snohomish deaeieBuilders <br /> was 'ronca oapplied re- <br /> modeling said they <br /> problems <br /> City's with the Building <br /> fic9edn aoulremodeling e <br /> the n d be held <br /> to a more reasonable level and said <br /> rrent <br /> the-Buildin sDepartm n ed a surplus account from fees collected at • <br /> the Mayor Msaid t surplus was duet such as Boeing <br /> and John <br /> Fluke a s o <br /> a normal t <br /> situation <br /> construction <br /> concurred <br /> and tproposed nschhedulleereflected ur <br /> current 1 costs and <br /> suggested the schedulec could reviewed annually. <br /> Councilman Baker asked about costs for time spent by other <br /> in the building process and Hugh Warren,of the Public Works Department, <br /> said <br /> tame thathet department,and the Planning Department anent a considerable <br /> Councilman Aldcroft asked Mx.Kelm what he felt would be a <br /> inc and answer was 20-258. appropriate <br /> cilman Michelson said the fee increase would automatically be <br /> o the consumer <br /> that it was not the intent of the City to make a <br /> fowit. Hesfelt the <br /> eddby t Cshou only cover actual costs necessary <br /> • <br /> Bill Cushman,Finance D ,however, <br /> in the u1980nb surplus and there could lbe 4a <br /> deficit in the 1f83ab not stated there a minimum of le <br /> 408 increaseins to cover'�this. a <br /> Kelm flebuilding could accept the 408 increase an <br /> fees ratherthanthe60 proposed. <br /> sed. <br /> • <br /> Councilman Aldcx asked •an escalation <br /> incorporated into the ft fthe f would alae _ en <br /> with the c tyear'sld be <br /> rec index an Cattle said it could. <br /> would •Mr.Cushman said the minimum 408 increase in fees cover <br /> the expenses of.the ld g partment and would notcoverythose costsPresident <br /> , <br /> of other;departments. <br /> replied. Overstreet asked if anyone else wished to speak and no one <br /> • <br /> Moved by hearing.Councilman Baker,seconds by Councilman L g ,to close the <br /> Public <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yes. <br /> ant• Motion carried <br /> • <br /> s CIL BILL MD.808-364 <br /> • FINAL READING: <br /> AN fBproviding the aode <br /> 1 Editions f the 1979 <br /> the Csthe Washing- <br /> ton - <br /> ng Code; <br /> and gthe E oflicg ordinances a parts of ordinances an conflict <br /> therewith. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.