Laserfiche WebLink
427 <br /> September IP,1980 <br /> PUBLIC HEARING_FEDERAL AVENUE PR 806-=31, <br /> Pre <br /> ident Overstreet said <br /> thea l s <br /> a a result of <br /> R ztib "_ede --0- al Avenue PRO <br /> located o Federal vn thelock tatrYh or Grandview. <br /> President <br /> treet explained the ground rules to <br /> _ ra - bfollowed a <br /> this <br /> publicarinvThere <br /> wouldbphases, <br /> tfwh h d <br /> to hear new evidence hnta tpop <br /> beingtedexraime they disufficient opportunity <br /> to comment <br /> nopponents remarks <br /> due to the lateness of e hourat <br /> 52 the previouspublichearingPhase uniyt re s s,etc. <br /> Phase <br />)5 be Council's time to ask uestions and request clarification of issues. <br /> 21 Then <br /> the public <br /> 06 new issues would wopportunity °present 0 <br /> and thosenotq alreadye an matter of record.2290 <br /> The public hearing would then be close d b entertained <br /> 00 amendmentsiffnthisemotion did <br /> 0onot pass motion could be made y project. <br /> 91 City A staid h o problem with the gvraalreee <br /> 51 a or by President Over reef. <br /> 24 Councilmant Longue objected to having a n first t approve the <br /> gg projectandfeltd the right t deny f t _ <br /> Overstreet saiditwould be his prerogative to do so if he 9isneaaen <br />�. <br /> Bill Baker,A e proponents,stated they <br /> would be <br /> topedestrian <br /> walkway <br /> heproperty t Jackson School. <br /> This tall bewcurb and would cost <br /> approximately • <br /> 516,000. a felt ,P <br /> safety,especially for schoolchildrenas voiced <br /> b <br /> the neighbOrhOod. <br /> • <br /> Gary <br /> Attorney for t opponents, that <br /> ofwalkway would traffic rand that children <br /> would be dashing across the street irregardless ofhaving <br /> a <br /> walkway <br /> not and the r <br /> saidt <br /> Ordinance would not permit Federal would <br /> wederalAvenue to be used as an arterial if <br /> concrete walkways were installed. • <br /> the i of d comprehensive planning, <br /> utilities,compatibility,s 10.or dinance •and drat g,amon <br /> others not adequately addressed. <br /> . <br /> walk w to meet certain <br /> Citreatandards and g warren replrea that it would.Ve <br /> Mr.Brandstetter said the neighborhood is also asking the City to <br /> Federal Avenue <br /> already <br /> dyefact that d has traffic than it <br /> fora entials andtheneie <br /> neighborhood does not want it <br /> to-become an arterial. - <br /> President Overstreet asked Mr.Brandstetter if tYvdf td <br /> be <br /> make any difference he <br /> alit' about the proposed PRO and 2tr.that <br /> s io not <br /> y <br /> address one of the issues and not others such as <br /> density,etc. <br /> Mx.Paul Pritchard gave a presentation use,congestion and wfigura <br /> iatherp itions <br /> that existandwould be unthinkable to al_ow further develop- <br /> ment in the neighborhood. <br />